Rob scroll down for your answer...
Keep scrolling...
A little further....
That's right Rob, like everyone else in the world you should put the blame squarely on Bush. He and "big oil" banded together to make you feel down in the dumps.
I would have gone with Global Warming, but I couldn't find a head-shot of Global Warming so I went with Bush.
Actually try not reading, hearing, paying attention to anything dealing with politics or political issues for at least a week - two if you can. It is very therapeutic.
Showing newest 64 of 68 posts from 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007. Show older posts
Showing newest 64 of 68 posts from 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007. Show older posts
Thursday, May 31, 2007
Caprichos
When I was in school, the first time around, I had a paper that I wrote in art history over Goya and a series of prints that he did called the Caprichos. Wikipedia covers them a little better here. The gist of what he was doing was taking a series of really skewering shots at Spanish society, from to to bottom.
Each person in the class had to write a paper over one of the images from the series. This was my image.
The lithograph is of human female faced owls flying around with human male faced owls as three women below them put a plucked male faced fowl on a spit. It didn't make sense prior to me researching it but in the efforts of writing the paper I discovered that whores in Spain, at that time, were commonly called "Buhos", or owls. This was due to the hours that owls, as well as whores, kept and the fact that they both hunted at night. This knowledge helps the print make more sense as you can see that the older women, presumably the madames of the whore houses, are the ones shown as preying on the male owls that have been snared.
So why tell you all of this? I have no idea other than the fact that my office is over near Northwest Highway and at least once a week you'll see something like this.
It constantly reminds me that the money girl like this makes never stops with them. There is always someone behind it, be it a pimp or a dealer, that gets that cash. What's worse is that this girl and whatever guys climb on her are the ones that are taking the risks and will eventually burn themselves down.
For my 2 cents, there is no such thing as a victimless crime.
Each person in the class had to write a paper over one of the images from the series. This was my image.
The lithograph is of human female faced owls flying around with human male faced owls as three women below them put a plucked male faced fowl on a spit. It didn't make sense prior to me researching it but in the efforts of writing the paper I discovered that whores in Spain, at that time, were commonly called "Buhos", or owls. This was due to the hours that owls, as well as whores, kept and the fact that they both hunted at night. This knowledge helps the print make more sense as you can see that the older women, presumably the madames of the whore houses, are the ones shown as preying on the male owls that have been snared.So why tell you all of this? I have no idea other than the fact that my office is over near Northwest Highway and at least once a week you'll see something like this.
It constantly reminds me that the money girl like this makes never stops with them. There is always someone behind it, be it a pimp or a dealer, that gets that cash. What's worse is that this girl and whatever guys climb on her are the ones that are taking the risks and will eventually burn themselves down.For my 2 cents, there is no such thing as a victimless crime.
Belay that order
Sorry about that.
Yesterday really sucked. Not in the "one big event that sucked so bad that it totally jilts you" kind of way. Yesterday was one of those death by 1,000,000 paper cuts kind of days.
I am kind of burned out. I've been fighting blogging burn out for a little while. I noticed a while back that a lot of my posts were just rants. Now, don't get me wrong, venting has it's place but I'm typically an optimist and I bum myself out if I stay too negative too long.
That being said, blogging isn't my problem. Nothing here really brought that on. So consider this a Jackson Pollock-esque bender. I'm not going to quit blogging. I've made too many friends and had too much fun doing it but I think I may ease off the gas and be a little more selective in my efforts.
SO, like Maverick in Top Gun, I shall dramatically pull back into the dog fight with the Russian migs, after making Stinger, played by James Tolkan in the movie but by Hoodlumman in our version, get frustrated and pound the table and curse because he put me up in the air with Iceman and now he's riding solo. By the way, did you realize that Tim Robbins was in that movie? Weird.
So my "talk to me Goose" moment is over and I'm back in.
Yesterday really sucked. Not in the "one big event that sucked so bad that it totally jilts you" kind of way. Yesterday was one of those death by 1,000,000 paper cuts kind of days.
I am kind of burned out. I've been fighting blogging burn out for a little while. I noticed a while back that a lot of my posts were just rants. Now, don't get me wrong, venting has it's place but I'm typically an optimist and I bum myself out if I stay too negative too long.
That being said, blogging isn't my problem. Nothing here really brought that on. So consider this a Jackson Pollock-esque bender. I'm not going to quit blogging. I've made too many friends and had too much fun doing it but I think I may ease off the gas and be a little more selective in my efforts.
SO, like Maverick in Top Gun, I shall dramatically pull back into the dog fight with the Russian migs, after making Stinger, played by James Tolkan in the movie but by Hoodlumman in our version, get frustrated and pound the table and curse because he put me up in the air with Iceman and now he's riding solo. By the way, did you realize that Tim Robbins was in that movie? Weird.
So my "talk to me Goose" moment is over and I'm back in.
I'm Back
I've been on vacation in New Mexico since Saturday and have returned. Things on my 'To Do' short list you should expect soon.
- Post about my New Mexico adventures (with pics!!)
- Update the FIU wire
- Find the bastard that posted under Rob's account and kick his ass
Fuck it
I don't need this shit.
Too many times I sit there and stare at the screen or at the news trying to figure out something to say or something funny or something new. Too many times I piss away part of my lunch typing up posts.
Why?
I've gotten a pretty nice set of friends out of blogging and I've enjoyed that. I like being able to have political discussion. Hell, I acknowledge that I'm a an mental/emotional voyeur/exhibitionist. Mostly, I just like to goof off and make people laugh.
But you know what? I'm not laughing.
I'm out.
Too many times I sit there and stare at the screen or at the news trying to figure out something to say or something funny or something new. Too many times I piss away part of my lunch typing up posts.
Why?
I've gotten a pretty nice set of friends out of blogging and I've enjoyed that. I like being able to have political discussion. Hell, I acknowledge that I'm a an mental/emotional voyeur/exhibitionist. Mostly, I just like to goof off and make people laugh.
But you know what? I'm not laughing.
I'm out.
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
Today's time waster
Linked from Shell's blog, Cupid's Leading man test.
Your's truly, I got John Wayne
Your Score: John Wayne
You scored 64% Tough, 0% Roguish, 19% Friendly, and 19% Charming!

You, my friend, are a man's man, the original true grit, one tough talking, swaggering son of a bitch. You're not a bad guy, on the contrary, you're the ultimate good guy, but you're one tough character, rough and tumble, ready for anything. You call the shots and go your own way, and if some screwy dame is willing to accept your terms, that's just fine by you. Otherwise, you'll just hit the open trail and stay true to yourself. You stand up for what you believe and can handle any situation, usually by rushing into the thick of the action. You're not polished and you're not overly warm, but you're a straight shooter and a real stand up guy. Co-stars include Lauren Bacall and Maureen O'Hara, tough broads who can take care of themselves.
Your's truly, I got John Wayne
Your Score: John Wayne
You scored 64% Tough, 0% Roguish, 19% Friendly, and 19% Charming!

You, my friend, are a man's man, the original true grit, one tough talking, swaggering son of a bitch. You're not a bad guy, on the contrary, you're the ultimate good guy, but you're one tough character, rough and tumble, ready for anything. You call the shots and go your own way, and if some screwy dame is willing to accept your terms, that's just fine by you. Otherwise, you'll just hit the open trail and stay true to yourself. You stand up for what you believe and can handle any situation, usually by rushing into the thick of the action. You're not polished and you're not overly warm, but you're a straight shooter and a real stand up guy. Co-stars include Lauren Bacall and Maureen O'Hara, tough broads who can take care of themselves.
For the ladies, find out what kind of classic dame you'd make by taking the Classic Dames Test.
(By the way, we need to make sure that we use "dame" and "broad" around this place more often.)
The Republican rundown
So far, the field of possible Presidential hopefuls has had me less than enthused. I know that a lot of people are complaining about the length of this pre-campaign run. I was as well, but now I think that I've changed my tune. For the first time ever we've seen people have to defend their bid before the primaries. In a way that's been pretty nice in that we aren't getting the surprises as we are voting on the guys. Now, they get plenty of time to hang themselves before the primaries.
So who are our hopefuls and what do I think of them? I'll give you a list of where I'm at on them. If course, it will probably change over time but I'm OK with that. So, in no particular order:
Sam Brownback manages to stay off of my radar. His stances on his website look fine until you get to his section on the "culture" and he mentions "combating pornography, pushing for decency on the airwaves and decreasing violence on TV and video games." Now, I know that they all say crap like that to sound good to the older crowd but the truth is that I want Conservatives to understand that the US doesn't need a party to legislate morality. If I wanted a nanny, I'd vote Democrat. So while I doubt this is one of his hard core stances, that concerns me. It also bothers me that he has a low media profile. Before i could get behind him, I'd need to see him do something.
Newt Gingrich is a candidate that I like but I'm not sure that America would. He's got a lot of the right characteristics but he also has personal baggage and the role that he played during the Clinton years to overcome. I'd vote for him if the party nominates him but I'm not sure he'll be able to pull it off.
Rudy Guiliani was an early favorite for me. I really liked him and I thought that he had a good shot to be a great crossover candidate. However, I can't back him. His stiff necked refusal to alter his position on abortion and his views on gun control worry too much. If he gets the party nod, I'll vote for him rather than stay home as long as he promises not to further "abortion" causes and promises to stand put on the 2nd amendment. Otherwise, I'd rather stay home.
Mike Huckabee is one of my favorites. He falls right down the line on the type of character I'd like to see as a sitting President. Unfortunately, he's just not getting the press. Of course that can change, and I hope it does. If not, I think any person running would be dumb not to tap him for a VP.
John McCain is a turd. If the party nominates him, I'll drop my party affiliation. He's an arrogant elitist who compromises with the Dem's on major subjects way too often. He's backed two of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed and he's too soft on immigration. In short, he sucks.
George Pataki is a waste of time. His unelectable at this time and too small. The best he ca hope for is a Cabinet post and to increase his visibility but he's not Conservative enough for me.
Mitt Romney is one that intrigues me. Personally, I could care less about the whole "Mormon thing" the press has tried to play up. I care more about what he's said and done. In that, he's stood a pretty hard line in a Democrat legislated state and I don't consider that any small feat. I also thing he has the proper charisma and Conservative values to ride on. I'd consider him to be one of my favorites at this point.
Tom Tancredo suffers from the same thing as Sam Brownback. If I have to go look up what you stand for on your website then your not visible enough. I don't see any glaring holes in his stances but I don't want an Obama type candidate who is all smiles but says nothing of substance. Get yourself in the news with some good ideas and good speeches and then defend it. After that I could give you a better feel.
Finally, Fred Thompson is supposed to announce sometime this July. In that, I think we might have a "rock star" that the typically a-political American will back. He understands the theatre of how to work a camera and he has a pretty sharp Conservative background. He'll have to combat his personal life issues but I don't see that as a deal killer. So if he jump in and make a good show if it up to the primary, I think this whole thing could actually be his.
Your thoughts?
So who are our hopefuls and what do I think of them? I'll give you a list of where I'm at on them. If course, it will probably change over time but I'm OK with that. So, in no particular order:
Sam Brownback manages to stay off of my radar. His stances on his website look fine until you get to his section on the "culture" and he mentions "combating pornography, pushing for decency on the airwaves and decreasing violence on TV and video games." Now, I know that they all say crap like that to sound good to the older crowd but the truth is that I want Conservatives to understand that the US doesn't need a party to legislate morality. If I wanted a nanny, I'd vote Democrat. So while I doubt this is one of his hard core stances, that concerns me. It also bothers me that he has a low media profile. Before i could get behind him, I'd need to see him do something.
Newt Gingrich is a candidate that I like but I'm not sure that America would. He's got a lot of the right characteristics but he also has personal baggage and the role that he played during the Clinton years to overcome. I'd vote for him if the party nominates him but I'm not sure he'll be able to pull it off.
Rudy Guiliani was an early favorite for me. I really liked him and I thought that he had a good shot to be a great crossover candidate. However, I can't back him. His stiff necked refusal to alter his position on abortion and his views on gun control worry too much. If he gets the party nod, I'll vote for him rather than stay home as long as he promises not to further "abortion" causes and promises to stand put on the 2nd amendment. Otherwise, I'd rather stay home.
Mike Huckabee is one of my favorites. He falls right down the line on the type of character I'd like to see as a sitting President. Unfortunately, he's just not getting the press. Of course that can change, and I hope it does. If not, I think any person running would be dumb not to tap him for a VP.
John McCain is a turd. If the party nominates him, I'll drop my party affiliation. He's an arrogant elitist who compromises with the Dem's on major subjects way too often. He's backed two of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed and he's too soft on immigration. In short, he sucks.
George Pataki is a waste of time. His unelectable at this time and too small. The best he ca hope for is a Cabinet post and to increase his visibility but he's not Conservative enough for me.
Mitt Romney is one that intrigues me. Personally, I could care less about the whole "Mormon thing" the press has tried to play up. I care more about what he's said and done. In that, he's stood a pretty hard line in a Democrat legislated state and I don't consider that any small feat. I also thing he has the proper charisma and Conservative values to ride on. I'd consider him to be one of my favorites at this point.
Tom Tancredo suffers from the same thing as Sam Brownback. If I have to go look up what you stand for on your website then your not visible enough. I don't see any glaring holes in his stances but I don't want an Obama type candidate who is all smiles but says nothing of substance. Get yourself in the news with some good ideas and good speeches and then defend it. After that I could give you a better feel.
Finally, Fred Thompson is supposed to announce sometime this July. In that, I think we might have a "rock star" that the typically a-political American will back. He understands the theatre of how to work a camera and he has a pretty sharp Conservative background. He'll have to combat his personal life issues but I don't see that as a deal killer. So if he jump in and make a good show if it up to the primary, I think this whole thing could actually be his.
Your thoughts?
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
Conversations with my Mom: Or "Why I'm so much cooler than the 'normal' kids"
IM recieved at 10:25 this morning from my mother:
Me: SO why the Biel or Alba question?
Mom: I was just curious what you thought. I just don't see Alba as "sexy."
Me: Sure. Not to take anything away from Alba, because she's hot but it's not in a "sexy" hot. Biel's sexy is erotic. Alba might be a freak, but you know Beil is a freak.
Mom: Yeah, Alba is too "little girl" cute.
Now, how many of you rate chicks with your mom?
See? My mom kicks ass.
In a related vein, I have a new contraversy for the educated FIU reader.
Danica Patrick


or
Milka Duno


or
Sarah Ficher

Debate!
Alba or Beil?IM replied to Mother, via cell phone:
Biel, hands downLater Phone call:
Me: SO why the Biel or Alba question?
Mom: I was just curious what you thought. I just don't see Alba as "sexy."
Me: Sure. Not to take anything away from Alba, because she's hot but it's not in a "sexy" hot. Biel's sexy is erotic. Alba might be a freak, but you know Beil is a freak.
Mom: Yeah, Alba is too "little girl" cute.
Now, how many of you rate chicks with your mom?
See? My mom kicks ass.
In a related vein, I have a new contraversy for the educated FIU reader.
Danica Patrick


Milka Duno


Sarah Ficher

Debate!
Some life lessons come harder than others
On CNN today they have a story that I had honestly hoped to see years ago. Cindy Sheehan is quitting the anti-war movement.
Casey made a choice. She may feel that the country is evil, Bush is Satan, Up is Down, Black is White and that Chocolate is Vanilla. Her feelings are irrelevant to the fact that he made his choice. She could have said any of 1,000,000,000 things to him and never had it effect his decision. She could have said nothing and had seen him change his mind. We don't know. We simply don't. However, we do know that the name on the enlistment papers said his name and not hers. We do know that he didn't fight his deployment. We do know he didn't shirk his duties. We know that he served his country right up to the moment he died.
She might not agree with his decision but she needs to accept that she was never in control of him to begin with. She didn't "fail" him. He made a series of decisions. In fact, they were decisions that were his to make.
As a person who also pointed out the negative effects that this could, and did, have on the troop morale and public perception of the war, I also feel like it's important to point a latter statement of Cindy's out.
Well, hopefully the next flash in the pan see Cindy and figures it out. People use other people, especially in politics. It's a concept I though that most people had grasped but it seems that some haven't.
So now that it's over, if it truly is, am I going to miss her? No, not one bit. I prefer to watch the "train wrecks" not the slow grinding halt of a thrown rod.
(H/t Kieth. I was typing on it even as you IM'd me.)
"I have tried ever since he died to make his sacrifice meaningful," she wrote. "Casey died for a country which cares more about who will be the next American Idol than how many people will be killed in the next few months while Democrats and Republicans play politics with human lives.Here is the crux of her whole problem, in fact the crux of many parent's problems, when is comes to having kids and what they do with their lives. Kids, regardless of their age, are free willed individuals. That means that they think and decide and do things on their own, without consulting us and , occasionally, totally contrary to what we think is good. Our children, from birth until death, will make an infinite number of decision of various scopes and sizes that are dictated by just as many external and internal forces. Our guidance, however thorough and comprehensive we endeavor to make it, is merely one of those forces.
"It is so painful to me to know that I bought into this system for so many years, and Casey paid the price for that allegiance. I failed my boy and that hurts the most." (em mine)
Casey made a choice. She may feel that the country is evil, Bush is Satan, Up is Down, Black is White and that Chocolate is Vanilla. Her feelings are irrelevant to the fact that he made his choice. She could have said any of 1,000,000,000 things to him and never had it effect his decision. She could have said nothing and had seen him change his mind. We don't know. We simply don't. However, we do know that the name on the enlistment papers said his name and not hers. We do know that he didn't fight his deployment. We do know he didn't shirk his duties. We know that he served his country right up to the moment he died.
She might not agree with his decision but she needs to accept that she was never in control of him to begin with. She didn't "fail" him. He made a series of decisions. In fact, they were decisions that were his to make.
As a person who also pointed out the negative effects that this could, and did, have on the troop morale and public perception of the war, I also feel like it's important to point a latter statement of Cindy's out.
Sheehan warned that the United States was becoming "a fascist corporate wasteland," and that onetime allies among Bush's Democratic opposition turned on her when she began trying to hold them accountable for bringing the 4-year-old war to a close.Another life lesson to get out of this is one that Cindy, not Casey, missed. When you got from "no one" to "someone" question why that is. In the midst of all the rhetoric about "America's political hegemony" and "imperialistic war machines" she was spouting in sunny Venezuela and cheery Cuba, there had to be a moment where she realized that she had sold out her own cause. At some point she had to wonder why the politicians were so willing to be seen with her one week and then so willing to dump her the next. Sadly, if she ever had a clue that she was getting used before now we couldn't tell but it would have been better for everyone if she had discovered that a few years ago. It would have been better for her, and it seems that she realizes that it would have been better for her family too.
In the meantime, she said her antiwar activism had cost her her marriage, that she had put the survivor's benefits paid for her son's death and all her speaking and book fees into the cause and that she now owed extensive medical bills.
"I am going to take whatever I have left and go home," she wrote. "I am going to go home and be a mother to my surviving children and try to regain some of what I have lost.
"I will try to maintain and nurture some very positive relationships that I have found in the journey that I was forced into when Casey died and try to repair some of the ones that have fallen apart since I began this single-minded crusade to try and change a paradigm that is now, I am afraid, carved in immovable, unbendable and rigidly mendacious marble."
Well, hopefully the next flash in the pan see Cindy and figures it out. People use other people, especially in politics. It's a concept I though that most people had grasped but it seems that some haven't.
So now that it's over, if it truly is, am I going to miss her? No, not one bit. I prefer to watch the "train wrecks" not the slow grinding halt of a thrown rod.
(H/t Kieth. I was typing on it even as you IM'd me.)
Monday, May 28, 2007
Memorial Day Quote of the Day
From Defenselink.mil:
Memorial Day is not about patriotism. It isn't about politics. It isn't about whether or not we agree with the deployment of troops in the conflict of the day.
Memorial Day is about honoring those who have given their lives in the causes of this nation, whether or not we agree with the politics of why.
Those who serve may oppose the very fight they are in, but they serve because that is what they are called to do, and this day is to honor those who have passed. Whether or not they agreed with the causes to which they were called to fight.
If you see one, thank a soldier today. He may die for your freedom tomorrow.
Iraq war veteran Army Capt. Dennis J. Skelton, who brought fellow servicemembers from Walter Reed Army Medical Center National and the Naval Medical Center at Bethesda to the event, recognizes that American support for military personnel has undergone a tremendous change.Memorial Day is not a "Happy X" holiday, it is, and should be, more of a day of somber and thoughtful reflection upon the sacrifice of the men and women called to duty.
“It’s amazing to see the transition that has occurred in this country over the last four decades between the last major conflict, which was Vietnam, and the global war on terror,” Skelton said. “There is definitely no shortage of patriotism in this country, and that’s evident by the number of non-profit, philanthropic organizations, and attention that America has given.
Skelton, a former platoon leader with the 25th Infantry Division in Fallujah, Iraq, lost his left eye and suffered other injuries in a rocket-propelled-grenade attack.
“To me, and to all of my peers that are in hospitals recovering – sailors, soldiers, airmen and Marines – it’s amazing to watch and witness America understanding that there’s a difference between those that make policy and those that enforce policy. And they will continue to support those who enforce, and while in the same breath, debating in a public forum, those who make it,” he said. “It’s just a beautiful thing to finally evolve to an area that we can professionally in the same forum do both simultaneously.
“It’s great to know that even though there are some who may not agree with intentions or involvements and outcomes, they will forever support me as an individual that voluntarily made that choice to serve in a very complex environment,” he said.
Memorial Day is not about patriotism. It isn't about politics. It isn't about whether or not we agree with the deployment of troops in the conflict of the day.
Memorial Day is about honoring those who have given their lives in the causes of this nation, whether or not we agree with the politics of why.
Those who serve may oppose the very fight they are in, but they serve because that is what they are called to do, and this day is to honor those who have passed. Whether or not they agreed with the causes to which they were called to fight.
If you see one, thank a soldier today. He may die for your freedom tomorrow.
Saturday, May 26, 2007
"Let Are Kids Walk"
From WFAA.com:
Next, we have the apparent overachiever on campus lamenting the fact that she will be unable to graduate with her 3.5 GPA:
Parents of several teens that I know have long commented about the fact that their children are being taught the test and little else in school, and now the kids not only can't identify the Republic of Texas on a map, but they can't even pass a test that the teaches emphasize in the curriculum.
And don't tell me the test is too difficult. Obviously it isn't the test. Look at the sign in the article.
Students who had been planning to walk across the stage at graduation ceremonies this weekend were instead walking a picket line Thursday morning.Okay, lets start with the worst part of the article. The photo used to lead the story includes a protester with a sign which reads "Let Are Kids Walk." This is just so sad that I have no words.
The Trimble Tech High School seniors marched in front of Fort Worth Independent School District headquarters to protest Wednesday's decision by trustees to bar students who failed the TAKS test from commencement exercises.
About a dozen young people, carrying signs and chanting, began picketing at 8:30 a.m. Thursday. They represent the 613 Fort Worth seniors who did not pass the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills exam.
Next, we have the apparent overachiever on campus lamenting the fact that she will be unable to graduate with her 3.5 GPA:
Crystal Martinez complained that while she finished at the top of her class with a 3.5 grade point average, she is now blocked from graduation by failing the TAKS test.How sad a day for education in America when the best a student at any school can do is pull a 3.5. And what does this say of the teachers when they GIVE her the grades that amount to a 3.5 and she is still too dumb to pass a test which the teachers essentially TEACH TO in the first plac.?
Parents of several teens that I know have long commented about the fact that their children are being taught the test and little else in school, and now the kids not only can't identify the Republic of Texas on a map, but they can't even pass a test that the teaches emphasize in the curriculum.
And don't tell me the test is too difficult. Obviously it isn't the test. Look at the sign in the article.
Friday, May 25, 2007
Savanna Wars II: Water Buffalo Strike Back
This is probably the coolest nature v. nature video I've ever seen.
As Ace says, stick with it until the end.
As Ace says, stick with it until the end.
34 (as per Wikipedia)
34 is the natural number following 33 and preceding 35.
34 is the atomic number of selenium.
34 is the jersey number of Calgary Flames' Miikka Kiprusoff, former Houston Rockets legend Hakeem Olajuwon, Chicago Bears football player Walter Payton, former Buffalo Bills football player Thurman Thomas, and former Houston Oilers football player Earl Campbell.
34 is the jersey number of former baseball outfielder Kirby Puckett, former baseball pitcher Nolan Ryan, former baseball pitcher Fernando Valenzuela, star Shaquille Oneal and Chicago Cubs pitcher Kerry Wood.
34 AD is the year that Stephen, the first martyr of Christianity, was stoned to death. It is the year that the Roman emipre began construction of a three tier Roman aqueduct beginning in Nimes and running for 269 miles
34 BC is the year that Mark Antony establishes Cleopatra as a Hellenistic monarch at Alexandria.
34 is also how old I am today.
Yeah, ME!!!!
(I was going to mention what Urban Dictionary said 34 meant but that would dumb the post down)
34 is the atomic number of selenium.
34 is the jersey number of Calgary Flames' Miikka Kiprusoff, former Houston Rockets legend Hakeem Olajuwon, Chicago Bears football player Walter Payton, former Buffalo Bills football player Thurman Thomas, and former Houston Oilers football player Earl Campbell.
34 is the jersey number of former baseball outfielder Kirby Puckett, former baseball pitcher Nolan Ryan, former baseball pitcher Fernando Valenzuela, star Shaquille Oneal and Chicago Cubs pitcher Kerry Wood.
34 AD is the year that Stephen, the first martyr of Christianity, was stoned to death. It is the year that the Roman emipre began construction of a three tier Roman aqueduct beginning in Nimes and running for 269 miles
34 BC is the year that Mark Antony establishes Cleopatra as a Hellenistic monarch at Alexandria.
34 is also how old I am today.
Yeah, ME!!!!
(I was going to mention what Urban Dictionary said 34 meant but that would dumb the post down)
Thursday, May 24, 2007
Gossip, TNOYF Style...
Many residents in the town, most of whom are suspected of massive in-breeding that has resulted in an abundance of shuffling, hump-backed children, now believe that the rumors are not true.Read the rest...
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Official Seal Generator
I found a fun new toy here.
It allowed me to make this:

Awesome.
Consider this a 'caption' contest of sorts. Let's see what you guys have...
All you guys and gals with blogs consider this a challenge. If you don't have a blog, the site will allow you to host it on Image Shack. Shoot a link to the address in the comments.
Update:
Let me add my Rob Submissions for reference

It allowed me to make this:

Awesome.
Consider this a 'caption' contest of sorts. Let's see what you guys have...
All you guys and gals with blogs consider this a challenge. If you don't have a blog, the site will allow you to host it on Image Shack. Shoot a link to the address in the comments.
Update:
Let me add my Rob Submissions for reference

Here comes the ACLU...
or, maybe not....
Come on guys... Right?
WOODSTOCK, Ill. — A pair of 16-year-old girls face hate crime charges after they allegedly handed out anti-gay fliers targeting a classmate at their northern Illinois high school.I'm sure they'll be there any second. Protecting free speech and the 1st amendment. Right?
The girls were arrested May 11 after handing out fliers in the parking lot of Crystal Lake South High School that depict a male student kissing another boy and contain hateful language about gays.
Officials say the fliers targeted a male classmate, who is also a neighbor of the girls. The two girls had apparently been feuding with the boy.
Earlier today, a judge rejected bond for one of the girls, citing her home environment and already lengthy juvenile record — 13 run-ins with the cops. Instead of home detention, the girl will be held at the Kane County Juvenile Justice Center while the case is pending, according to the Daily Herald.
Come on guys... Right?
How to watch the Stanley Cup Finals and care when your team isn't in it: A Tutorial
The Stanley Cup Finals are upon us. Last night I watched the game, with my dad and my brother, in which The Ducks secured their spot. However, I know this moment creates some difficulty for marginal hockey fans and those who really would like to care but just can't. For those people, I'd like to give you my Official Rob B Method of Manufacturing Passion for Hockey when your teams not involved.
Get a piece of paper and make two columns, one for each team. This will be your score sheet that will allow you to see where you really sit, cause it ain't on the fence during the finals.
First, what conference is your favorite team in? Give the team that's in the other conference 5 points. We wanted your team, not that team in the finals so you can hate them a little for that.
Second, Look at both teams rosters for former players of your favorite team. For everyone you find give that team 5 points. Those guys played for you so you can extend them some loyalty.
Third, look at those same rosters for players that you hate, for whatever reason. Subtract 5 points from that team.
Fourth, whose uniforms look coolest. Give that team one point.
Fifth, which team has the gayest mascot? Subtract a point from that team.
Sixth, if one of the teams knocked your team out of the playoffs this year then you give the other team 50 points. I know some people say "but if they go all the way than it's not so bad that my team lost to them..." That's crap. They beat your team and they probably cheated. Be a man about it and call the a "cheating, cup thieving group of butt monkeys" and mean it.
Seventh, if either team has "ice girls" or "cheerleaders" or the like they get 2 points.
Eighth, if the team is located in your country they get 5 points.
I ran my list using the Dallas Stars as my favorite team.
The result was The Ducks had a -21. The Sens had a 21. So with 42 points difference, it was easy to point to the fact that I'm sick of the Ducks and I hate about 6 of their players. (Sorry Teemu, I still like ya but you're going down.) So Diana, can count me as on the Sens band wagon for the next 4 games. (Yeah, it'll only take 4.) And the Ducks can rest assured of my continued hate.
At this point you should have a a fair tally to indicate which way you need to fall in rooting for the finals. However, in the case of some fans they simple don't have the hockey knowledge to really feel in touch with the sport despite my list. For you select few, I suggest you flip a coin, pick a team and place a $1000 bet on that team for the finals. By the end of the second game you'll be an expert on the left wing lock and neutral zone breakout plays.
Get a piece of paper and make two columns, one for each team. This will be your score sheet that will allow you to see where you really sit, cause it ain't on the fence during the finals.
First, what conference is your favorite team in? Give the team that's in the other conference 5 points. We wanted your team, not that team in the finals so you can hate them a little for that.
Second, Look at both teams rosters for former players of your favorite team. For everyone you find give that team 5 points. Those guys played for you so you can extend them some loyalty.
Third, look at those same rosters for players that you hate, for whatever reason. Subtract 5 points from that team.
Fourth, whose uniforms look coolest. Give that team one point.
Fifth, which team has the gayest mascot? Subtract a point from that team.
Sixth, if one of the teams knocked your team out of the playoffs this year then you give the other team 50 points. I know some people say "but if they go all the way than it's not so bad that my team lost to them..." That's crap. They beat your team and they probably cheated. Be a man about it and call the a "cheating, cup thieving group of butt monkeys" and mean it.
Seventh, if either team has "ice girls" or "cheerleaders" or the like they get 2 points.
Eighth, if the team is located in your country they get 5 points.
I ran my list using the Dallas Stars as my favorite team.
The result was The Ducks had a -21. The Sens had a 21. So with 42 points difference, it was easy to point to the fact that I'm sick of the Ducks and I hate about 6 of their players. (Sorry Teemu, I still like ya but you're going down.) So Diana, can count me as on the Sens band wagon for the next 4 games. (Yeah, it'll only take 4.) And the Ducks can rest assured of my continued hate.
At this point you should have a a fair tally to indicate which way you need to fall in rooting for the finals. However, in the case of some fans they simple don't have the hockey knowledge to really feel in touch with the sport despite my list. For you select few, I suggest you flip a coin, pick a team and place a $1000 bet on that team for the finals. By the end of the second game you'll be an expert on the left wing lock and neutral zone breakout plays.
Securing my nerditude for future generations
Well, well, well. Check this out.
This is my birthday present from my mom. Here's a better look at it.
Sweet, huh. What? You want to know what it is? Ok. It's a carbonado diamond.
This is my birthday present from my mom. Here's a better look at it.
Sweet, huh. What? You want to know what it is? Ok. It's a carbonado diamond.Carbonado or "black" diamonds, are the exotic diamonds found in Brazil and the Central African Republic. They are unusual for being the color of charcoal and full of frothy bubbles. These diamonds can also have a face that looks like melted glass.You know you're jealous.
A research team led by Stephen Haggerty of Florida International University in Miami has presented a new study that the odd stones were brought to Earth by an asteroid billions of years ago. The findings were published online in the journal "Astrophysical Journal Letters" on December 20, 2006.
The scientists exposed polished pieces of carbonado to extremely intense infrared light. The test revealed the presence of many hydrogen-carbon bonds, indicating that the diamonds probably formed in a hydrogen-rich environment-such as that found in space. The diamonds also showed strong similarities to tiny nanodiamonds, which are frequently found in meteorites. Astrophysicists have developed theories predicting that nanodiamonds form easily in the stellar explosions called supernovas, which scatter debris through interstellar space.
Haggerty maintains that the deposits in the Central African Republic and Brazil, probably come from the impact of a diamond-rich asteroid billions of years ago, when South America and Africa were joined. So even though the two diamond fields are now thousands of miles apart, they're remnants of a single, original deposit. Haggerty estimated that the asteroid must have been about half a mile (one kilometer) in diameter.
The unusual bubbles seen in specimens of carbonados probably came from fizzing gases when the diamonds were forming, Haggerty added. This adds further credence to the extraterrestrial origin theory, since conventional diamonds form under immense pressure deep beneath the Earths crust, where gas bubbles simply couldn't form.
Carbonado diamonds also contain a mineral called osborneite, which has been found only in meteorites and comet dust recovered by the recent Stardust mission. Additionally, adding to the evidence for an extra-terrestrial origin, carbonado diamonds have never been reported among any of the other 600 tons of "conventional" diamonds mined, sorted, graded, traded, cut, and polished in the last century. Hopefully, researchers will eventually identify a carbonado parent body in the Asteroid Belt."
Monday, May 21, 2007
CNN's truthiness of the day
Navarrette: Immigration anxiety is cultural - CNN.com
Navarrette is very quick to point out that it the Americans faults that we don't want out culture to change due to immigration. However, he's wrong. We don't want our culture to change because of illegal immigration.
See, legal immigrants follow the rules and come here from many countries, not just the one south of us. Legal immigrants are also recorded, pay taxes if they work and aren't privy to every social service that we have. They didn't jump a river at midnight or hire a coyote and they aren't in violation of the law.
Now call me a silly cracker, since I'm just another poor, dumb, white Republican, but I don't mind people that don't break the law to get here. Typically speaking, they are less likely to have been lawbreakers elsewhere, they're less likely to get exploited and they're more likely to pay their own social security and taxes. They don't have to engage in identity theft to get a job. They don't have to hide from cops. They can get loans and buy property with impunity.
As far as the fact that they're Mexican, who cares? I have neighbors on 3 sides of me that are Mexican. I also have zero problems with any of them. We go to each other kids birthday parties. We share fence repair cost. It's no big deal. The Mexican culture is primarily based off of Christian ethos. All my neighbors are Christians, as am I, why would I perceive that as bad? And I don't care if my kids have to learn Spanish in school because, guess what? They already are. I took Spanish, as did the wife, as are my kids in their schools. We're in Texas for God's sake, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that you'll use Spanish more than you use Cantonese.
Navarrette may want to pat himself on the back for so aptly diagnosing all of white America as a bunch of closet racist who are afraid Mexicans, but he's a dumb ass for doing it. If you want to address border security, then do it. If you want to address immigration reform then fine. If you want to take on racism, then be my guest. Taking some quasi-enlightened aura on as the cultural guru of the divination of the American psyche is way outside of his scope.
Since he's on the job, why doesn't he tell me why we need to allow in people that break the law and reward it. Tell me why I need to subject a suffering social security to more strain. Explain to me how the country benefits from allowing non-English speaking, uneducated people jump in line in front of other countries just because they jumped the border. When you get willing to take on that, give me a call.
Navarrette is very quick to point out that it the Americans faults that we don't want out culture to change due to immigration. However, he's wrong. We don't want our culture to change because of illegal immigration.
See, legal immigrants follow the rules and come here from many countries, not just the one south of us. Legal immigrants are also recorded, pay taxes if they work and aren't privy to every social service that we have. They didn't jump a river at midnight or hire a coyote and they aren't in violation of the law.
Now call me a silly cracker, since I'm just another poor, dumb, white Republican, but I don't mind people that don't break the law to get here. Typically speaking, they are less likely to have been lawbreakers elsewhere, they're less likely to get exploited and they're more likely to pay their own social security and taxes. They don't have to engage in identity theft to get a job. They don't have to hide from cops. They can get loans and buy property with impunity.
As far as the fact that they're Mexican, who cares? I have neighbors on 3 sides of me that are Mexican. I also have zero problems with any of them. We go to each other kids birthday parties. We share fence repair cost. It's no big deal. The Mexican culture is primarily based off of Christian ethos. All my neighbors are Christians, as am I, why would I perceive that as bad? And I don't care if my kids have to learn Spanish in school because, guess what? They already are. I took Spanish, as did the wife, as are my kids in their schools. We're in Texas for God's sake, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that you'll use Spanish more than you use Cantonese.
Navarrette may want to pat himself on the back for so aptly diagnosing all of white America as a bunch of closet racist who are afraid Mexicans, but he's a dumb ass for doing it. If you want to address border security, then do it. If you want to address immigration reform then fine. If you want to take on racism, then be my guest. Taking some quasi-enlightened aura on as the cultural guru of the divination of the American psyche is way outside of his scope.
Since he's on the job, why doesn't he tell me why we need to allow in people that break the law and reward it. Tell me why I need to subject a suffering social security to more strain. Explain to me how the country benefits from allowing non-English speaking, uneducated people jump in line in front of other countries just because they jumped the border. When you get willing to take on that, give me a call.
Saturday, May 19, 2007
Friday, May 18, 2007
The IMDB lists scorecard
Here is the list and the movies. You guys did very well which proves that the people that read this blog are smart. In fact they are the smartest blog readers in the world and the only way someone could deny that would to be to read what I just wrote on this blog thereby grouping them in with the smartest blog readers in the world.
Anyway, here we go.
1.Space Travel / Blood Drinking / Religion / Homosexuality / Giant Worm
Dune ~ I think this was the first one nailed. It's greatness. I love the whole early 80's cg of the shield suits, Patrick Stewart as Gurney and the 4 hour version is the only way to roll.
2.No Opening Credits / Future / 555 Phone Number / Mentor / Cat
The Matrix ~ Major eye SFX candy. I still remember the first moment you say Trinity run on a wall and did the WTF? And when you first realized that he was in a computer program, I was hooked.
3. Computer / Hyperspace / Outer Space / Martial Arts / Invented Language
Star Wars ~ It's become fashionable to poop on George Lucas and Star Wars as my generation gets older because we're so much more nuanced and smarter now. Well, those people can save their time trying to sell me on how bad the movies are. Star Wars was, and is, an epic step forward. It gave us awesome effects, THX sound, Princess Leia in a gold bikini and Chewbacca.
4. Rape / Stabbed In The Back / Based On Comic Book / Wolf / Love Slave
300 ~ This one was a bit harder because it's new enough that the "wait for video" crowd hasn't seen it, which is a big mistake. This movie is bad ass. Take all the bad ass of "Troy" and put it on meth and crack, and you might have some idea of how bad ass this movie is.
5. Presumed Dead / Kidnapping / Father Son Relationship / Mexican Border / Mexican
Big Jake ~ Best Line: "Now you listen to me, I don't care if it your fault, my fault or nobody's fault. I'm gonna blow your head off. No matter who else gets it. No matter who else dies. I'm gonna blow your head off."
6. Anachronistic / Jewish Humor / Nazi / Actor Playing Multiple Roles / Nazis
Blazing Saddles ~ In today's PC laden world, there is no way a major studio would have the balls to make this movie today. Thankfully, they made it back then.
7. 1980s / Brothel / Gagged And Bound / Humor / Supernatural Powers
Big trouble in Little China ~ " Like I told my ex wife, Honey, I never drive faster than I can see and after that it's all in the reflexes." Get a six pack and watch it.
8. Parenthood / Profanity / Tense / Crushed Head / Mission
Aliens ~ Let's see, Space marines? Check. Aliens? Check. Blowing a lot of stuff up? Check. I have no idea what more a person could want than the movie that almost typecast Bill Paxon for life. "Game over, man. Game Over."
9. Christmas / Clay Animation / High School / Black Comedy / Surreal
Better Off Dead ~ I watched this movie so many times in Jr high it was scary. The best part is all the little subtle jokes in it, the things you see the 2nd or third time you see it. Besides, this was the movie that introduced me, briefly as it was, to blues. When they're playing Muddy Water's "Mannish Boy" as he drives that Camaro out of his garage... dude, I was hooked.
10. Infantry / Military Officer / Sergeant / Female Nudity / WWII Veteran
Band of Brothers ~ A Christmas or two ago I was asked what I wanted for the holidays. I was asked to make a list. This boxed set of disk WAS my entire list. If you haven't seen them, rent it from blockbuster and write off a weekend because they are additively good.
So there they are. I surprised myself by leaving out movies like the Blade trilogy, Lord of the Rings Trilogy, the Blues Brothers, The Great Escape and a lot of other quality films. Still, that was pretty fun.
Anyway, here we go.
1.Space Travel / Blood Drinking / Religion / Homosexuality / Giant Worm
Dune ~ I think this was the first one nailed. It's greatness. I love the whole early 80's cg of the shield suits, Patrick Stewart as Gurney and the 4 hour version is the only way to roll.
2.No Opening Credits / Future / 555 Phone Number / Mentor / Cat
The Matrix ~ Major eye SFX candy. I still remember the first moment you say Trinity run on a wall and did the WTF? And when you first realized that he was in a computer program, I was hooked.
3. Computer / Hyperspace / Outer Space / Martial Arts / Invented Language
Star Wars ~ It's become fashionable to poop on George Lucas and Star Wars as my generation gets older because we're so much more nuanced and smarter now. Well, those people can save their time trying to sell me on how bad the movies are. Star Wars was, and is, an epic step forward. It gave us awesome effects, THX sound, Princess Leia in a gold bikini and Chewbacca.
4. Rape / Stabbed In The Back / Based On Comic Book / Wolf / Love Slave
300 ~ This one was a bit harder because it's new enough that the "wait for video" crowd hasn't seen it, which is a big mistake. This movie is bad ass. Take all the bad ass of "Troy" and put it on meth and crack, and you might have some idea of how bad ass this movie is.
5. Presumed Dead / Kidnapping / Father Son Relationship / Mexican Border / Mexican
Big Jake ~ Best Line: "Now you listen to me, I don't care if it your fault, my fault or nobody's fault. I'm gonna blow your head off. No matter who else gets it. No matter who else dies. I'm gonna blow your head off."
6. Anachronistic / Jewish Humor / Nazi / Actor Playing Multiple Roles / Nazis
Blazing Saddles ~ In today's PC laden world, there is no way a major studio would have the balls to make this movie today. Thankfully, they made it back then.
7. 1980s / Brothel / Gagged And Bound / Humor / Supernatural Powers
Big trouble in Little China ~ " Like I told my ex wife, Honey, I never drive faster than I can see and after that it's all in the reflexes." Get a six pack and watch it.
8. Parenthood / Profanity / Tense / Crushed Head / Mission
Aliens ~ Let's see, Space marines? Check. Aliens? Check. Blowing a lot of stuff up? Check. I have no idea what more a person could want than the movie that almost typecast Bill Paxon for life. "Game over, man. Game Over."
9. Christmas / Clay Animation / High School / Black Comedy / Surreal
Better Off Dead ~ I watched this movie so many times in Jr high it was scary. The best part is all the little subtle jokes in it, the things you see the 2nd or third time you see it. Besides, this was the movie that introduced me, briefly as it was, to blues. When they're playing Muddy Water's "Mannish Boy" as he drives that Camaro out of his garage... dude, I was hooked.
10. Infantry / Military Officer / Sergeant / Female Nudity / WWII Veteran
Band of Brothers ~ A Christmas or two ago I was asked what I wanted for the holidays. I was asked to make a list. This boxed set of disk WAS my entire list. If you haven't seen them, rent it from blockbuster and write off a weekend because they are additively good.
So there they are. I surprised myself by leaving out movies like the Blade trilogy, Lord of the Rings Trilogy, the Blues Brothers, The Great Escape and a lot of other quality films. Still, that was pretty fun.
Thursday, May 17, 2007
I got bad, bad news
I took the Earth Day Foot print quiz and guess what? If everyone lived like me we'd need 7.5 Earths to accommodate for all the natural resources that I consume.
You can test for yourself here.
This isn't good but I know a way that we can all make a difference: From now on, all of you walk when you go places. Me? I'll still drive. That way you're more than compensating for me.
Now I know some of you are going to think "Why does he get to drive" or "Why is he so special?" Well, I'm not really. The reason is that I don't feel in the least bit guilty because I'm a bad person, and to be honest I'm cool with that, so you guys and gals with all this eco-guilt are going to have to take up the slack. Sorry, them's the breaks. On the plus side, you'll lose a few pounds walking so really this is all for your benefit anyway. What can I say, I'm a giver.
You can test for yourself here.
This isn't good but I know a way that we can all make a difference: From now on, all of you walk when you go places. Me? I'll still drive. That way you're more than compensating for me.
Now I know some of you are going to think "Why does he get to drive" or "Why is he so special?" Well, I'm not really. The reason is that I don't feel in the least bit guilty because I'm a bad person, and to be honest I'm cool with that, so you guys and gals with all this eco-guilt are going to have to take up the slack. Sorry, them's the breaks. On the plus side, you'll lose a few pounds walking so really this is all for your benefit anyway. What can I say, I'm a giver.
David the Dog: One Man's Best Friend
This human interest story was first brought to my attention a few days ago by an employee of mine. Dwayne is passionate about his dogs - to the point that I often wonder if they mean more to him than any person in his life.
David the dog won't leave his master's side, but his story has gone international.Dwayne was originally planning to donate less, but something derisive in his wife's response caused him to up the ante, much to her dismay.
Saturday, The Saginaw News featured the predicament of Richard R. "Ram" Reister, 55, of Chesaning, a disabled Army veteran who is trying to raise money for an operation to save his dog's life.
He put out fliers around town in April that read: "Attention. $10 gets your lawn cut and trimmed. Disabled vet needs work to save money to pay for surgery for my dog and best friend. Contact Ram at (989) 413-2517."
Dwayne R. Machinski, 40, of Emmett called from Iraq, where he is a civilian contractor. A former Army infantryman himself, he said he has two dogs at home that he can't wait to see when he gets home. He's sending Reister $200.So, good on ya Dwayne, and my compliments to all of the other dog lovers out there who are helping Mr. Reister with his situation.
"I know how expensive vet bills can be," he said. "If his dogs need help, dude, I know exactly what he's going through."
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
We got tagged
So I got "the tap" from the Ken S., "the man" over at It comes in pints for a movie meme.
The game works like this: Pick out your ten favorite movies, then look them up at IMDb. In the overview at the top of each movie's page, there are "Plot Keywords," usually five of them. (Plus more, if you click the link.) Take the first five, and post them. Then the rest of us get to play movie buff and see if we can guess them.
So here is my list:
1.Space Travel / Blood Drinking / Religion / Homosexuality / Giant Worm
(Sounds like a home video...Right?)
2.No Opening Credits / Future / 555 Phone Number / Mentor / Cat
(This one should be difficult because that description is no help to me.)
3. Computer / Hyperspace / Outer Space / Martial Arts / Invented Language
(Once again, not exactly helpful.)
4. Rape / Stabbed In The Back / Based On Comic Book / Wolf / Love Slave
(This series of descriptors also explains why my wife and i watch drastically different movies.)
5. Presumed Dead / Kidnapping / Father Son Relationship / Mexican Border / Mexican
(I love this film)
6. Anachronistic / Jewish Humor / Nazi / Actor Playing Multiple Roles / Nazis
7. 1980s / Brothel / Gagged And Bound / Humor / Supernatural Powers
8. Parenthood / Profanity / Tense / Crushed Head / Mission
9. Christmas / Clay Animation / High School / Black Comedy / Surreal
10. Infantry / Military Officer / Sergeant / Female Nudity / WWII Veteran
So, movie mavens, get after is and figure out my favorites.
I'll give the answers on Friday.
Update:
I like what Ken Did over at his blog so I'll steal his idea and post the ones that you guys got right.
#1 is Dune (hood, Cullen, Ken and Jr all nailed that one.
#2 is The Matrix (Bubba)
By the way, one of my top remaining ones in on bubba's guess list but not at the spot he mentioned it.
The game works like this: Pick out your ten favorite movies, then look them up at IMDb. In the overview at the top of each movie's page, there are "Plot Keywords," usually five of them. (Plus more, if you click the link.) Take the first five, and post them. Then the rest of us get to play movie buff and see if we can guess them.
So here is my list:
1.Space Travel / Blood Drinking / Religion / Homosexuality / Giant Worm
(Sounds like a home video...Right?)
2.No Opening Credits / Future / 555 Phone Number / Mentor / Cat
(This one should be difficult because that description is no help to me.)
3. Computer / Hyperspace / Outer Space / Martial Arts / Invented Language
(Once again, not exactly helpful.)
4. Rape / Stabbed In The Back / Based On Comic Book / Wolf / Love Slave
(This series of descriptors also explains why my wife and i watch drastically different movies.)
5. Presumed Dead / Kidnapping / Father Son Relationship / Mexican Border / Mexican
(I love this film)
6. Anachronistic / Jewish Humor / Nazi / Actor Playing Multiple Roles / Nazis
7. 1980s / Brothel / Gagged And Bound / Humor / Supernatural Powers
8. Parenthood / Profanity / Tense / Crushed Head / Mission
9. Christmas / Clay Animation / High School / Black Comedy / Surreal
10. Infantry / Military Officer / Sergeant / Female Nudity / WWII Veteran
So, movie mavens, get after is and figure out my favorites.
I'll give the answers on Friday.
Update:
I like what Ken Did over at his blog so I'll steal his idea and post the ones that you guys got right.
#1 is Dune (hood, Cullen, Ken and Jr all nailed that one.
#2 is The Matrix (Bubba)
By the way, one of my top remaining ones in on bubba's guess list but not at the spot he mentioned it.
Let the music play
Hadn't heard this is probably 20 years....

I also wanted to note that Shannon was not afraid to use 'dancing' as a form of transportation here, "he's dancing his way back to me." Outstanding!

We started dancing and love put us into a grooveIt came on the radio this morning. See girls, there's a message in here. Don't mind what he does or if he "dances" with someone else... just keep dancing and he'll come back to you. At which time you should accept him back without question. Ahh... simpler times.
As soon as we started to move
The music played while our bodies displayed through the dance
Then love picked us up for romance
I thought it was clear
The plan was we would share this feeling just between ourselves
But when the music changed the plan was rearranged
He went to dance with someone else
We started dancing and love put us into our groove
But now he's with somebody new
What does love want me to do
Love said..
Let the music play, he won't get away
Just keep the groove and then he'll come back to you again
Let it play
Let the music play, he won't get away
This groove he can't ignore, he won't leave you anymore
He tried pretending our dance is just a dance but I see
He's dancing his way back to me
Yes he discovered we are truly lovers
Magic from the very start
Cause love just can't we prove
And anytime we move
And even though we danced apart
So we started dancing and love put us into our groove
As soon as we started to move, as soon as we started to move
Love said..
Let the music play, he won't get away
Just keep the groove and then he'll come back to you again
Let it play
Let the music play, he won't get away
This groove he can't ignore, he won't leave you anymore
He tried pretending our dance is just a dance but I see
He's dancing his way back to me, he's dancing his way back to me
Love said..
Let the music play, he won't get away
Just keep the groove and then he'll come back to you again
Let it play
Let the music play, he won't get away
This groove he can't ignore, he won't leave you anymore
I also wanted to note that Shannon was not afraid to use 'dancing' as a form of transportation here, "he's dancing his way back to me." Outstanding!
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Half a million...
File it Under just blew through 500,000 hits this morning. Not all 500,000 in one morning! That'd be silly. And we'd be Instapundit.
No, no... since June 2004 we've amassed half-a-million hits - mostly on the coattails of thongs and celebrity photos.
But we're pretty confident that a solid 20,000 or so are our repeat readers, so thanks to you guys, always.
Rob wants to do a Men of Fileitunder 2008 Calendar in celebration of this milestone. I have agreed.
And in due time, Dave and JRE will agree, too.
No, no... since June 2004 we've amassed half-a-million hits - mostly on the coattails of thongs and celebrity photos.
But we're pretty confident that a solid 20,000 or so are our repeat readers, so thanks to you guys, always.
Rob wants to do a Men of Fileitunder 2008 Calendar in celebration of this milestone. I have agreed.
And in due time, Dave and JRE will agree, too.
Pure Hatred...
This Fark thread (re: the news today on Jerry Falwell's health) has to rival the most vile threads found on Democratic Underground, Huffington Post and Daily Kos, easily.
If anyone tells you that Fark has a balanced readership or leans conservative, send them this link.
Warning: If you don't like people celebrating the potential death of someone else, don't read it.
I've never heard Fark.com lumped in with other websites and blogs when people write or blog on the hatred and vileness that internet anonymity brings - and how the left side of the blogosphere is much more foul than the right.
Maybe they should be included, if they haven't already.
If anyone tells you that Fark has a balanced readership or leans conservative, send them this link.
Warning: If you don't like people celebrating the potential death of someone else, don't read it.
I've never heard Fark.com lumped in with other websites and blogs when people write or blog on the hatred and vileness that internet anonymity brings - and how the left side of the blogosphere is much more foul than the right.
Maybe they should be included, if they haven't already.
Starbucks' wisdom, or lack thereof?
I went to Starbucks this morning for coffee. The coffee I got came in the typical Starbucks cup. These cups now include Starbucks "Way I see it" sayings. The purpose is given on their website as:

It reads:
Personally, I'm OK with it because I don't feel particularly challenged by most of the cups to alter my core beliefs and it does foster conversation, which is one of Starbucks corporate image selling points. However, the greater question about whether or not our society has the patience to look at an issue and discuss it rationally is still a business gamble.
Your thoughts?
Sparking conversation In the tradition of coffee houses everywhere, Starbucks has always supported a good, healthy discussion. To get people talking, “The Way I See It” is a collection of thoughts, opinions and expressions provided by notable figures that now appear on our widely shared cups.This was mine, of which the picture I will post.

It reads:
"Why in moments of crisis do we ask God for strength and help? As cognitive beings, why would we ask something that may well be a figment of our imaginations for guidance? Why not search inside ourselves for the power to overcome? After all, we are strong enough to cause most of the catastrophes we need to endure."Now that's less interesting than cup 230:
---Bill Schell, a Starbucks customer from London, Ontario, Canada
Heaven is totally overrated. It seems boring. Clouds, listening to people play the harp. It should be somewhere you can’t wait to go, like a luxury hotel. Maybe blue skies and soft music were enough to keep people in line in the 17th century, but Heaven has to step it up a bit. They’re basically getting by because they only have to be better than Hell.Lest one think that Starbucks has gone anti-religion they also have these cups:
-- Joel Stein, Columnist for the Los Angeles Times
The Way I See It #92:So here's my question: knowing that they are going to get complaints by having cups that opine on religion and knowing that people are too PC today to not "get offended," is it a wise marketing idea to include these things on their cups?
You are not an accident. Your parents may not have planned you, but God did. He wanted you alive and created you for a purpose. Focusing on yourself will never reveal your purpose. You were made by God and for God, and until you understand that, life will never make sense. Only in God do we discover our origin, our identity, our meaning, our purpose, our significance, and our destiny.
-- Dr. Rick Warren, author of "The Purpose-Driven Life"
and
The Way I See It #158:
It's tragic that extremists co-opt the notion of God, and that hipsters and artists reject spirituality out of hand. I don't have a fixed idea of God. But I feel that it's us – the messed-up, the half-crazy, the burning, the questing – that need God, a lot more than the goody-two-shoes do.
-- Mike Doughty, musician
Personally, I'm OK with it because I don't feel particularly challenged by most of the cups to alter my core beliefs and it does foster conversation, which is one of Starbucks corporate image selling points. However, the greater question about whether or not our society has the patience to look at an issue and discuss it rationally is still a business gamble.
Your thoughts?
Labels:
christianity,
moral relativism,
poetry,
politics,
religion,
science,
work
Monday, May 14, 2007
Today's moment of culture
Invictus
By William Ernest Henley. 1849–1903
OUT of the night that covers me,
Black as the Pit from pole to pole,
I thank whatever gods may be
For my unconquerable soul.
In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.
Beyond this place of wrath and tears
Looms but the Horror of the shade,
And yet the menace of the years
Finds, and shall find, me unafraid.
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll,
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.
By William Ernest Henley. 1849–1903
OUT of the night that covers me,
Black as the Pit from pole to pole,
I thank whatever gods may be
For my unconquerable soul.
In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.
Beyond this place of wrath and tears
Looms but the Horror of the shade,
And yet the menace of the years
Finds, and shall find, me unafraid.
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll,
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.
Ok ... you geniuses .... you ....
Compliments
This Saturday I took my boys over to my mom's house in order to wash her car for mother's day. Since I'm not a rookie, I made sure to pack extra clothes for everyone. I know how any equation that includes "my sons" and "water" ends. As expected, everyone got drenched.
There was one surprise, though. I gave my sons the job of doing the tires while I was to wash the car. I fully expected them to give up on it early and just play with the water hose. What I discovered is that my eldest son stuck with it, with no encouragement from me, until he had done each wheel. What's more impressive is that he did a really, really good job. I honestly spent about 10 seconds a wheel getting a few little spots that needed a "man strength" scrubbing to get road tar off, but other than that he had those wheels spotless.
It really impressed me that his own little work ethic, at six, convinced him to be patient and through. As a result, we made sure that Gran knew that he had cleaned the wheels and I bragged on him to everyone I could that night and the next day.
I say all of this because I know as a parent that it is very easy to have a bad day or a frustrating moment with your child and to blow the response out of proportion. As a result, we as parent have to work on gaining "instant perspective" in trying to discipline instead of disciplining out of our emotional response. However, in light of that, I'd like to encourage you to never, never miss the chance to highlight and compliment your child on a job well done. Just like telling your children "please" and "thank you" when they do things for you teaches them about the proper way to act while showing them respect, complimenting your children helps them build self esteem off of their accomplishments. That's a really good thing because they need to understand that they can be proud of hard, honest work.
Try to keep your perspective on praising them for mundane matters. I'm happy for my son when he sticks with it and beats a level on his video game instead of giving up and I'll tell him that. That's an accomplishment, in some sense, in that it shows him the value of not quitting. Still, I'm much happier to see him try hard on the playing field to score a goal. Both are still trivial in that he won't remember either of them years from now but the goal is more important to me in that it's both physical and mental toughness he's learning. Now, when he cleans his room or helps his mother, that gets the top marks because it physical, mental and it's helping someone besides himself. I'll praise him for any of those thing but it isn't equal. I try to praise him wile some perspective so that he can see what's important.
Shockingly, this works with people who aren't kids. It seems that everyone likes compliments. And what makes that even better is that it's a positive reinforcement that allows the ability place emphasis on your desired priority.
Try it. Compliment someone. Compliment your kids. See if you can see a difference.
There was one surprise, though. I gave my sons the job of doing the tires while I was to wash the car. I fully expected them to give up on it early and just play with the water hose. What I discovered is that my eldest son stuck with it, with no encouragement from me, until he had done each wheel. What's more impressive is that he did a really, really good job. I honestly spent about 10 seconds a wheel getting a few little spots that needed a "man strength" scrubbing to get road tar off, but other than that he had those wheels spotless.
It really impressed me that his own little work ethic, at six, convinced him to be patient and through. As a result, we made sure that Gran knew that he had cleaned the wheels and I bragged on him to everyone I could that night and the next day.
I say all of this because I know as a parent that it is very easy to have a bad day or a frustrating moment with your child and to blow the response out of proportion. As a result, we as parent have to work on gaining "instant perspective" in trying to discipline instead of disciplining out of our emotional response. However, in light of that, I'd like to encourage you to never, never miss the chance to highlight and compliment your child on a job well done. Just like telling your children "please" and "thank you" when they do things for you teaches them about the proper way to act while showing them respect, complimenting your children helps them build self esteem off of their accomplishments. That's a really good thing because they need to understand that they can be proud of hard, honest work.
Try to keep your perspective on praising them for mundane matters. I'm happy for my son when he sticks with it and beats a level on his video game instead of giving up and I'll tell him that. That's an accomplishment, in some sense, in that it shows him the value of not quitting. Still, I'm much happier to see him try hard on the playing field to score a goal. Both are still trivial in that he won't remember either of them years from now but the goal is more important to me in that it's both physical and mental toughness he's learning. Now, when he cleans his room or helps his mother, that gets the top marks because it physical, mental and it's helping someone besides himself. I'll praise him for any of those thing but it isn't equal. I try to praise him wile some perspective so that he can see what's important.
Shockingly, this works with people who aren't kids. It seems that everyone likes compliments. And what makes that even better is that it's a positive reinforcement that allows the ability place emphasis on your desired priority.
Try it. Compliment someone. Compliment your kids. See if you can see a difference.
Friday, May 11, 2007
Myopic
The dictionary defines Myopic in terms of the eye condition but also adds the definition "3. lacking tolerance or understanding; narrow-minded." This is a post about some myopic people. Guess which group is the myopic one.
It seems that a lesbian couple have filed suit on an Athletic club because they wouldn't let them and thier 11 year old daughter join under the gyms family plan, which is $40 a month cheaper, becasue they aren't legally married. In their state, Minnesota, gay marriage has not been recognized.
The money quotes on this thing come from their lawyer. He's pursuing the case on the grounds of sexual discrimination. Now, note in the article where the club owner says that he doesn't serve homosexuals, then point it out to me, because he never does. He offered to let them join as individuals. However the lawyer feels that he'll be able to attack the decision based on their sexual orientation, as opposed to the legality of thier not legally recognized marriage. Here's the lawyers quote:
So, what is the couples comment on the case?
(h/t Mom, and for what it's worth I emailed this to Jeff Over at Protein Wisdom, so if he runs with it expect a comment throw down.)
It seems that a lesbian couple have filed suit on an Athletic club because they wouldn't let them and thier 11 year old daughter join under the gyms family plan, which is $40 a month cheaper, becasue they aren't legally married. In their state, Minnesota, gay marriage has not been recognized.
The money quotes on this thing come from their lawyer. He's pursuing the case on the grounds of sexual discrimination. Now, note in the article where the club owner says that he doesn't serve homosexuals, then point it out to me, because he never does. He offered to let them join as individuals. However the lawyer feels that he'll be able to attack the decision based on their sexual orientation, as opposed to the legality of thier not legally recognized marriage. Here's the lawyers quote:
"This is not about marriage," said the Monson’s attorney, Joni Thome. "It’s about sexual orientation. The legal relationship is not what matters. What matters is what people acknowledge themselves to be. "Well, your clients acknowledge themselves to be married, when they legally are not, yet want the married price. That's the contested point.
So, what is the couples comment on the case?
"If we can get the court to agree that this is not about the marriage debate – that this is about sexual orientation – I think the ruling will carry over to other institutions in our state and to other states as well."By the way, lest you think their suit is philanthropic to the gay ethos alone, they are suing for $50,000 for "pain and mental anguish." Not exactly Rosa Parks, but then they want to get paid.
(h/t Mom, and for what it's worth I emailed this to Jeff Over at Protein Wisdom, so if he runs with it expect a comment throw down.)
Good thing these weren't here 10 years ago...
Or I might not be.
Reef sandals with a wide logo-trimmed strap and an extra-cushioned footbed. Finished with super-secret heavy-duty plastic flasks built in to each midsole. Includes a flask key/bottle opener.
It Just Felt Right
More and more often we hear about people who are doing things by a relativistic moral compass instead of any kind of absolute moral guide. Today I read a story about three kids who are excellent examples, and quite possibly crowning achievements, of the moral relativism movement in Western cultures.
It seems that three teenage girls were having a sleepover following a amphetamine fueled night of partying and while the third slept the other two were discussing whether or not they would feel bad about killing someone. That discussion led to what follows:
This is what the modern age of feel good practices, the self-esteem movement, and modern institutional practices have brought us. A world where two girls did murder because it "felt right."
Bill probably felt right getting head from Monica in the oval office too.
It seems that three teenage girls were having a sleepover following a amphetamine fueled night of partying and while the third slept the other two were discussing whether or not they would feel bad about killing someone. That discussion led to what follows:
The two teenagers, then aged 16, stayed in one room and decided to kill Davis the next day during a morning chat.The worst part of the whole matter though, is this little tidbit:
The girl who carried out the strangling told police she watched calmly as the emotions on her friend's face shifted from anger to terror as she realized they intended to kill her.
After the murder the pair buried Davis in a shallow grave under the house and reported her missing, but turned themselves in after realizing the grave would be found in a search.
The pair told authorities they were sorry about the impact of the murder on the Davis family, but killing her "felt right" at the time.Note that the girls are not happy about the impact on the still living, but they don't mind that they snubbed out the life of their friend.
This is what the modern age of feel good practices, the self-esteem movement, and modern institutional practices have brought us. A world where two girls did murder because it "felt right."
Bill probably felt right getting head from Monica in the oval office too.
Thursday, May 10, 2007
ROFLCOPTER!
This is hilarious if you've seen 300.
If you haven't you might give out a hearty chuckle.
Or if not, you could give out a hearty WTF?
Update: The imagepile (of crap?) hosting site has moved or deleted this picture. If I can find it again, I'll relink it. I should have hosted it here. Lesson learned.
Found:
If you haven't you might give out a hearty chuckle.
Or if not, you could give out a hearty WTF?
Update: The imagepile (of crap?) hosting site has moved or deleted this picture. If I can find it again, I'll relink it. I should have hosted it here. Lesson learned.
Found:
Tales from the Court
I was reminded of this story by a friend and I felt the need to share it.
I used to work for the Federal Court. The building is protected by armed security under the watchful eye of the US Marshalls. As a result, everyone had to pass through metal detectors on the way into court. SO once upon a time, my boss and I headed through the employeee line at the metal detectors leading into the court. As we came through, we placed our stuff in the trays. On the other end, one of the armed security guys took my knife and opened it, held it up to a piece of paper and said " This knife is illegal. I'm going to have to take it."
I replied " No, it's not."
Standing up and getting all authoritative he gives me his quasi-cop stare and says "The blade is over 4 inches. I could arrest you for this." He then shows me this piece of paper with a photocopy of a 12 inch ruler on it.
I laughed at him and told him "The blade is 3 and 3/4 inches. I know that for a fact, but if you want to arrest me for it, please do. Until then I'm just going to hold on to your measuring paper and you can hold my knife. At the end of the day, I'll come down and we can report all of this to your supervisor."
He gave me a confused look but said ok. Hey, he wins. He has my knife, right?
About an hour later, I got a phone call to go down stairs to meet with the head of the US Marshalls office about the knife incident. Luckily, I knew the head Marshal because we were both hockey fans and talked hockey, so I knew I'd get a fair shake. So I roll into his office and there is the US Marshall, the security guy and his supervisor. We all sit down and he asks us what the problem is.
I offer to let the security guy to go first. He does. He tells his story and adds that I was "rude, confrontational and in violation of the law."
Once it was my turn, I asked if there was a rule against carring a legal knife in the building. Now this might have changed in a post 9/11 world but at the time the answer was "no." So I then asked the Marshall if he had a ruler. He did. I asked him to measure the blade. It was 3 3/4 inches. I then asked him to measure it on the piece of paper, it was 4 1/8th, or someting like that. Then he laughed and then I laughed and then both the security guard and his boss looked at us like we were nuts.
The marshal gave the guard his ruler and told him to use it from now on but that other than that he'd handle it from here. They left, and then we laughed a lot more.
For what it's worth, he kept the photocopied ruler and framed it and put it on his wall with a little sticker that said "US governmental ruler."
I used to work for the Federal Court. The building is protected by armed security under the watchful eye of the US Marshalls. As a result, everyone had to pass through metal detectors on the way into court. SO once upon a time, my boss and I headed through the employeee line at the metal detectors leading into the court. As we came through, we placed our stuff in the trays. On the other end, one of the armed security guys took my knife and opened it, held it up to a piece of paper and said " This knife is illegal. I'm going to have to take it."
I replied " No, it's not."
Standing up and getting all authoritative he gives me his quasi-cop stare and says "The blade is over 4 inches. I could arrest you for this." He then shows me this piece of paper with a photocopy of a 12 inch ruler on it.
I laughed at him and told him "The blade is 3 and 3/4 inches. I know that for a fact, but if you want to arrest me for it, please do. Until then I'm just going to hold on to your measuring paper and you can hold my knife. At the end of the day, I'll come down and we can report all of this to your supervisor."
He gave me a confused look but said ok. Hey, he wins. He has my knife, right?
About an hour later, I got a phone call to go down stairs to meet with the head of the US Marshalls office about the knife incident. Luckily, I knew the head Marshal because we were both hockey fans and talked hockey, so I knew I'd get a fair shake. So I roll into his office and there is the US Marshall, the security guy and his supervisor. We all sit down and he asks us what the problem is.
I offer to let the security guy to go first. He does. He tells his story and adds that I was "rude, confrontational and in violation of the law."
Once it was my turn, I asked if there was a rule against carring a legal knife in the building. Now this might have changed in a post 9/11 world but at the time the answer was "no." So I then asked the Marshall if he had a ruler. He did. I asked him to measure the blade. It was 3 3/4 inches. I then asked him to measure it on the piece of paper, it was 4 1/8th, or someting like that. Then he laughed and then I laughed and then both the security guard and his boss looked at us like we were nuts.
The marshal gave the guard his ruler and told him to use it from now on but that other than that he'd handle it from here. They left, and then we laughed a lot more.
For what it's worth, he kept the photocopied ruler and framed it and put it on his wall with a little sticker that said "US governmental ruler."
An educational update
The Spring semester has come to a close and I have taken my last final. With the Summer semesters rapidly approaching, let's take a look at the classes I took and how I fared.
First, let's look at biology. My lab instructor improved over the course of the year but was very disorganized and apathetic most of the time. Lecture on the other hand was sterling. In this class, on an experience level, I learned a lot of taxonomy. I got the chance to dissect a worm, a clam, a squid, an octopus,a crayfish, a frog, a starfish and a shark, which was cool because I love carving up critters. I also got verbal abused by a militant lesbian, hit on by a 18 year old with a daddy complex and thoroughly schooled two burgeoning ecologist on politics, how oil companies actually work and why fuel prices fluctuate.
My tests normally hung around a mid level B and I'm pretty sure that I aced my final. So my expectation for the class is that I'll get a B. I might slide to an A and I might fall to a C but I don't care. I've pretty much passed the last biology class that I should have to take.
Chemistry is the class I was most worried about because chemistry has shown me something about myself that I have better fix quickly. You see, I'm a great "in lab" chemist as far as predicting results, recording data and understanding the big picture of reactions. However, when you drag me through the mire of the calculations
and the endless conversions that were involved I got a major case of tired head. I simply hate all the applied math and the formulas. Math is not my friend. And guess what, I have to find a way to make math my friend quickly because I have to take Physics 1 and 2 this summer. And at a later date, I'll be taking pre-cal, and 2 semesters of calculus. So if someone knows a way to go from a non-math to a math loving person quickly, drop me a line because otherwise this will just have to be a battle of willpower and I know I learn better when I like the subject.
Anyway, I realized that I am a qualitative, not quantitative, minded person. That's great news for a geologist, but bad news for a person with math'o'plenty in their future. The end result is that sliding into the final I was holding a high C. We were taking the ACS standardized Chemistry exam, which is a total crap shoot as to what they'll put on there, as our final. I was hoping to do well enough to pull the C up to a B, but in the end I was just shy. I'm pretty sure I got the C. Still, C is passing and I don't believe I have any more chemistry in my future, so it's all good.
Geology was a cake walk. I had one poor test (I got a high C) right around the baby's birth, but my typical grade in geology an A. So between all the stuff I've done in there, I expect an A. If I get a B, that's fine. I won't, I'll get an A, but passing with an A or B is acceptable to me in that class. In truth, i'll miss this class a lot. I love my professor in there. Dr. Millwood made the class fun and she's an excellent teacher. She's also an excellent person. For that reason, I'm intending to make a concerted effort to keep in contact with her. I'll probably try to go mineral and fossil collecting with her when time permits. Still, I have no doubt that my transition back into school was made a lot easier by having her as one of my instructors.
The final grades aren't in yet, though I know what I got in chemistry, but for a guy working 40 hours a week, with a wife and 3 kids, I don't think that's half bad. For now, I'm going to enjoy the rest of a class free May but on June 3rd the hammer drops and I'm back after physics. In order to ensure some success in that class, I may go get a physics review book, or something, in order to bone up and get a better feel of what to look forward to.
Still, any comments, advice, congratulations or offers to go mineral collecting or drinking or both are welcome. Nigerian email offers are not and shall be suitably mocked.
First, let's look at biology. My lab instructor improved over the course of the year but was very disorganized and apathetic most of the time. Lecture on the other hand was sterling. In this class, on an experience level, I learned a lot of taxonomy. I got the chance to dissect a worm, a clam, a squid, an octopus,a crayfish, a frog, a starfish and a shark, which was cool because I love carving up critters. I also got verbal abused by a militant lesbian, hit on by a 18 year old with a daddy complex and thoroughly schooled two burgeoning ecologist on politics, how oil companies actually work and why fuel prices fluctuate.
My tests normally hung around a mid level B and I'm pretty sure that I aced my final. So my expectation for the class is that I'll get a B. I might slide to an A and I might fall to a C but I don't care. I've pretty much passed the last biology class that I should have to take.
Chemistry is the class I was most worried about because chemistry has shown me something about myself that I have better fix quickly. You see, I'm a great "in lab" chemist as far as predicting results, recording data and understanding the big picture of reactions. However, when you drag me through the mire of the calculations
and the endless conversions that were involved I got a major case of tired head. I simply hate all the applied math and the formulas. Math is not my friend. And guess what, I have to find a way to make math my friend quickly because I have to take Physics 1 and 2 this summer. And at a later date, I'll be taking pre-cal, and 2 semesters of calculus. So if someone knows a way to go from a non-math to a math loving person quickly, drop me a line because otherwise this will just have to be a battle of willpower and I know I learn better when I like the subject.
Anyway, I realized that I am a qualitative, not quantitative, minded person. That's great news for a geologist, but bad news for a person with math'o'plenty in their future. The end result is that sliding into the final I was holding a high C. We were taking the ACS standardized Chemistry exam, which is a total crap shoot as to what they'll put on there, as our final. I was hoping to do well enough to pull the C up to a B, but in the end I was just shy. I'm pretty sure I got the C. Still, C is passing and I don't believe I have any more chemistry in my future, so it's all good.
Geology was a cake walk. I had one poor test (I got a high C) right around the baby's birth, but my typical grade in geology an A. So between all the stuff I've done in there, I expect an A. If I get a B, that's fine. I won't, I'll get an A, but passing with an A or B is acceptable to me in that class. In truth, i'll miss this class a lot. I love my professor in there. Dr. Millwood made the class fun and she's an excellent teacher. She's also an excellent person. For that reason, I'm intending to make a concerted effort to keep in contact with her. I'll probably try to go mineral and fossil collecting with her when time permits. Still, I have no doubt that my transition back into school was made a lot easier by having her as one of my instructors.
The final grades aren't in yet, though I know what I got in chemistry, but for a guy working 40 hours a week, with a wife and 3 kids, I don't think that's half bad. For now, I'm going to enjoy the rest of a class free May but on June 3rd the hammer drops and I'm back after physics. In order to ensure some success in that class, I may go get a physics review book, or something, in order to bone up and get a better feel of what to look forward to.
Still, any comments, advice, congratulations or offers to go mineral collecting or drinking or both are welcome. Nigerian email offers are not and shall be suitably mocked.
Wednesday, May 09, 2007
Fixing global warming
Everyone seems to have their hands in the air over global warming, screaming that it's the end of the world, yada, yada, yada.
Well, I, for once, am not going to waste my time telling people to hold their horses and actually look at science. Nope. I just got done with my last final and from now until the next class starts I may just as well take a siesta from data too. However, I'm still going to fix your problem.
You want to fix global warming? Fine, I got two worlds for you: Nuclear Winter.
Here, I ripped this from the heaving cleavage of wikipedia:
Nuke the volcanoes!!
Nuke the volcanoes!!
Nuke the volcanoes!!
Nuke the volcanoes!!
Hey, Mt. Pinatubo cooled the earth 1 degree C after it's eruption in 1990, so this will work. And if people die, who cares. At least my plan doesn't call for people to drive wussy electric cars and not screw like that guy that Dave linked.
Well, I, for once, am not going to waste my time telling people to hold their horses and actually look at science. Nope. I just got done with my last final and from now until the next class starts I may just as well take a siesta from data too. However, I'm still going to fix your problem.
You want to fix global warming? Fine, I got two worlds for you: Nuclear Winter.
Here, I ripped this from the heaving cleavage of wikipedia:
Nuclear winter is a hypothetical global climate condition that is predicted to be a possible outcome of a large-scale nuclear war. It is thought that severely cold weather can be caused by detonating large numbers of nuclear weapons, especially over flammable targets such as cities, where large amounts of smoke and soot would be injected into the Earth's stratosphere. The term has also been applied to one of the after-effects of an asteroid impact or super volcano eruption.I say, why screw around, we need to nuke some volcanoes and soon to be volcanoes. Idaho... well, we got some bad news about old faithful. I expect the Ring of Fire to kick in. Come on everyone, repeat after me:
Nuke the volcanoes!!
Nuke the volcanoes!!
Nuke the volcanoes!!
Nuke the volcanoes!!
Hey, Mt. Pinatubo cooled the earth 1 degree C after it's eruption in 1990, so this will work. And if people die, who cares. At least my plan doesn't call for people to drive wussy electric cars and not screw like that guy that Dave linked.
F/U doesn't necessarily mean "follow-up" ...
but, on the odd chance that you can actually get your head around it ......
Canadian activists who attended a controversial conference in Cairo are calling on antiwar campaigners to show increased solidarity with Mideast "resistance movements," including Hezbollah and Hamas.Put these guys on the front lines ,.... and you go ......... poof!
According to an audio clip obtained yesterday by the Citizen, the activists issued the call at a public meeting April 27 in Toronto at which Canadian delegates reported on their experiences at the March 29 to April 1 Cairo Conference.
The focus of the conference was to forge an international alliance against "imperialism and Zionism." Twenty Canadians attended, mostly from Canadian antiwar groups.
more .....
America ! F@*$ Yeah!
MSD brought their 55 chevy by the office because one of the guys that I work with is related to someone that does something there ... or something, who cares?
Anyway look at this!
Sweet American engine porn!
Sweet American engine porn!


This is why America wins.
St. Lou of the Festering Pie Hole

The word has come down from on High. St. Dobbs of the Self Aggrandizing Populism has cast forth his edict on the efforts of Christendom to be involved in the debate over Illegal Immigration. From his hallowed office at CNN, he lays down the scriptural basis of his argument by quoting Romans 13:
"Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves."
This supposedly backs his opinion that the leadership of the churches are too separated from the desires and opinions of their followers and that they are foraying too far into the government and ignoring the separation of church and state.
Well, I'm not sorry to say that Lou is dead wrong, again. But this time he's managed to do it on many fronts.
First, the separation of church and state is the government's responsibility, not the people's and not Christian's job to maintain. Likewise, it's not in the Constitution whereas freedom of religion and freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are. You might want to deal with those before you try to limit the speech of churches and church goers.
Second, the church is not governed by the will of the people. The Church is tied to the will of God. While interpretations and results may vary per denomination and while internal power structures vary as well, the design of the church is to follow God's will not to bend towards populism. In short, God is not our copilot, he's the pilot. In as such, the people and the leaders are to follow one direction regardless of their personal opinion.
Third, the scripture quoted refers to bending towards the authority of those who are placed in power by God. However, in the governmental sense I'd like to ask St. Lou the Populist, who is the ultimate authority of the elected officials? That's right, the voters. Are Christian's voters? Why, yes, they are.
Also, considering his attempt at division of believers from their ministers on the ground of divine of mindset, wouldn't this very verse say that those who go to church should follow their God appointed leaders, in this case their ministers.
Somehow you managed to contradict your own argument twice with the same scripture. Pretty impressive.
Finally, the scripture, in context reads:
1Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. 3For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and he will commend you. 4For he is God's servant to do you good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword for nothing. He is God's servant, an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. 5Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also because of conscience. 6This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God's servants, who give their full time to governing. 7Give everyone what you owe him: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.Now why would Lou want to leave out the section about Authorities job to punish wrongdoers? Wouldn't that include illegal aliens? Oh, I get it. That would also include anyone that violates God's laws and we know that Lou doesn't want America governed by God's laws because that would upset all the lefties he panders to as a "sensible Republican that's bucked the system."
Congrats Lou. In selectively using scripture out of context to advocate a political and personal position on illegal immigration, while ignoring the REST OF THE BIBLE as any form of context, your now on the same plain as Fred Phelps.

He misuses God's word to justify hating gays and you misuse it to justify hating illegal immigrants.
My suggestion to Lou, and I don't have a "separation doctrine" to back this up with so it's just a strongly worded suggestion. why don't you consider a personal separation of media and religion since you don't know a thing about the interpretation of scripture? We misguided, open border loving, separation infringing "hoi palloi" may not grasp all the "nuance" that a media cultured elitist, such as yourself, can bend to your whim but we're still smart enough to know a self promoting snake oil salesman when we see one.
Labels:
bilingual,
christianity,
immigration,
media,
morons,
politics,
racism,
religion
Children are Bad for the Planet
Especially the children of people who live in developed countries....
Ladies and Gentlemen, I'm going to hold your children personally responsible for the declining air quality in the DFW Metroplex. And if the air quality improves, I'm going to blame global warming, which in turn allows me to keep blaming your children.
Babies are destroying the planet and must be stopped!
The world's population is expected to increase by 2.5 billion to 9.2 billion by 2050. Almost all the growth will take place in developing countries.Whackjobs like this are part of the reason that the environmental movement must be stopped.
The population of developed nations is expected to remain unchanged and would have declined but for migration.
The British fertility rate is 1.7. The EU average is 1.5. Despite this, Professor Guillebaud says rich countries should be the most concerned about family size as their children have higher per capita carbon dioxide emissions.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I'm going to hold your children personally responsible for the declining air quality in the DFW Metroplex. And if the air quality improves, I'm going to blame global warming, which in turn allows me to keep blaming your children.
Babies are destroying the planet and must be stopped!
Tuesday, May 08, 2007
Canadian peacenix do the full monty ....
Canadian activists were out in force at a recent conference in Cairo that sought to forge closer links between the international antiwar movement and Islamic resistance groups, including several on Canada's terrorism list.
About 20 Canadians attended the March 29 to April 1 Cairo Conference, the largest delegation from Canada in the event's five-year history. According to one report, Canada also had one of the largest delegations from outside the Middle East. In total, as many as 1,500 delegates from the Middle East, Europe, South Korea and the Americas attended.
Many of the Canadian delegates were from the Canadian Peace Alliance, the country's largest umbrella peace organization, and some of its 150 affiliated groups, said peace alliance co-ordinator Sid Lacombe, who attended the conference.
Groups that sent delegates include the Toronto Coalition to Stop the War, the Canadian Arab Federation, the Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid, Artists Against War, the Venezuela We Are With You Coalition, the Toronto-Haiti Action Committee, the Toronto-Egypt Solidarity Campaign and Not In Our Name -- Jews Against Israel's Wars.
The conference attracted representatives of at least four organizations that appear on Canada's list of terrorist organizations -- Hamas, Hezbollah, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and Jamaat al-Islamiya, best known for killing 71 tourists in Luxor, Egypt in 1997.
Among the attendees were Moussa Abu Marzouk, deputy leader of Hamas, and Ali Fayad, a member of Hezbollah's politburo.
more ......
SSDD, eh?
A query for those who have a strong enough stomach to ask hard questions
Question: Is it Islam or a culture of corruption that allows this to happen?
Answer: I don't care. This is wrong at every human level and whatever religious or cultural force protects it should be expunged from the face of the earth. Period.
Answer: I don't care. This is wrong at every human level and whatever religious or cultural force protects it should be expunged from the face of the earth. Period.
Southern Baptist* try to attack soldiers at Fort Dix
(* ~ by "Southern Baptist" I actually mean "Islamofacist" but would never refer to Islam as anything other than "the religion of peace" because they're so peaceful all the time)
Plenty of coverage, but I sniped this from CNN.
So guys from Jordan, Turkey and Yugslovia were here on US soil to try to kill US soldiers on a American soil? Wow, that sectarian violence in Iraq seems to have spread to Jordan, Turkey and Yugoslovia. Who knew that those "not al queda" types would jump on a plane and fly to America and cohabitate just so they could fight each other nearer to, and therefore "accidentailly killing," American troops. I mean, it's almost like these guys are terrorist.
Of course, that can't be the case. It's not like the US would ever be attacked by people who's primary point of connection is simply a religious belief structure. No America must have brought this on it's self by, you know, having money and not bagging and beating our women daily and reading something other than the quran. How could we not see that coming?
So at what point, can we start calling Islam "the religion of some peaceful people but also a few raging psychos?" You think that CAIR would mind that much?
Plenty of coverage, but I sniped this from CNN.
Six "Islamic radicals" involved in a plot to kill U.S. soldiers at Fort Dix in New Jersey were arrested Monday night, the U.S. attorney's office in New Jersey said Tuesday.
One of the suspects was born in Jordan, another in Turkey, the U.S. attorney's office said. The rest are believed to be from the former Yugoslavia, "either U.S. citizens or living illegally in the United States," the office said in a statement.
"Their alleged intention was to conduct an armed assault on the army base and to kill as many soldiers as possible," according to the statement.
The six are expected to appear in U.S. District Court in Camden on Tuesday afternoon, the U.S. attorney's office said in a statement.
The district attorney scheduled a news conference at 2:30 p.m. ET to discuss the case.
The men were planning to use automatic weapons to shoot soldiers at the Army post, according to a federal law enforcement source and a senior government source.
The men, some of whom were related to each other, had been doing surveillance and planning "for a while," and they trained in the Poconos Mountains in northeastern Pennsylvania, according to the federal law enforcement source.
So guys from Jordan, Turkey and Yugslovia were here on US soil to try to kill US soldiers on a American soil? Wow, that sectarian violence in Iraq seems to have spread to Jordan, Turkey and Yugoslovia. Who knew that those "not al queda" types would jump on a plane and fly to America and cohabitate just so they could fight each other nearer to, and therefore "accidentailly killing," American troops. I mean, it's almost like these guys are terrorist.
Of course, that can't be the case. It's not like the US would ever be attacked by people who's primary point of connection is simply a religious belief structure. No America must have brought this on it's self by, you know, having money and not bagging and beating our women daily and reading something other than the quran. How could we not see that coming?
So at what point, can we start calling Islam "the religion of some peaceful people but also a few raging psychos?" You think that CAIR would mind that much?
John Conyers, D-MI is Against Freedom of Expression
Congressman Conyers introduced HR 1592. Read it. Carefully.
Hate Crimes legislation boils down to how people think, and if we start to punish the way people think, instead of the act they committed, then we are on a slippery slope to the Democrat Party run Gulags.
Ron Paul (R-TX) says things very well concerning why we should worry about this type of legislation:
Hate Crimes legislation boils down to how people think, and if we start to punish the way people think, instead of the act they committed, then we are on a slippery slope to the Democrat Party run Gulags.
Ron Paul (R-TX) says things very well concerning why we should worry about this type of legislation:
HR 1592 could lead to federal censorship of religious or political speech on the grounds that the speech incites hate. Hate crime laws have been used to silence free speech and even the free exercise of religion. For example, a Pennsylvania hate crime law has been used to prosecute peaceful religious demonstrators on the grounds that their public Bible readings could incite violence. One of HR 1592's supporters admitted that this legislation could allow the government to silence a preacher if one of the preacher's parishioners commits a hate crime. More evidence that hate crime laws lead to censorship came recently when one member of Congress suggested that the Federal Communications Commission ban hate speech from the airwaves.Orwell must have turned in his grave.
Monday, May 07, 2007
I know most of you don't care but so what!
The Red Devils have won the Premiership for the ninth time. I love being the only person in my office to know that other than my Chelsea supporting boss who is coming in to find this article taped to his office door.
Smarter, and more useful, than your average bear

Meet BEAR (Battlefield Extraction and Retrieval Robot).
From the FAQ's:
Q: What does the BEAR robot do?
A: The patent-pending BEAR robot is capable of carefully lifting a human or other payload up to 500 lbs, and carrying it over a distance to safely set it down as directed by its operator.
Q: What controls the BEAR robot?
A: Currently it is under full wireless control by a single human operator. Eventually the BEAR will have more and more autonomous behaviors, which will make it easier to control.
I find this incredibly fascinating because over at Gail's she has up a great post linking a story on the Washington Post about the emotional connections that soldiers, specifically but humans in general, find they are making with robots that they are exposed to and work with daily. In the case of a robot like BEAR, I could very easily see how that would be the case.
What also interests me is that as the plane of interaction increases in regular society, you can imagine how much unskilled labor will eventually be partitioned to the realm of robotics. While it's not on us now, the day may very well come where in an AI like fashion we find that people express a great deal of passion both for and against them.
For example, consider today's immigration debate if we knew that all of the construction jobs in America would be robot driven in 3 years? Would they still be a novelty? I think I can safely say that they wouldn't be in some circles.
Like everything that humans have created, the capacity to use, misuse and abuse robots is something that we'll have to deal with as people and, like some many other things, I doubt that we will have a clear consensus on the issue.
Now, cybernetics and cyborgs.... that's going to be a train wreck.
Heat Category II

Last week the weather here in Iraq was relatively mild. I imagine that low to mid-90s would be seen as quite warm to folks from, say Wisconsin, but here in Iraq, this late in the year, the weather has been unseasonably cool. Not that I'm complaining, I'm just commenting that it was much warmer much earlier a year ago; and the year before for that matter.
Today we finally hit weather that is expected for this time of year. We have jumped to Heat Category II and approximate temperatures of 111.
The figure above shows what the various heat categories mean, along with recommended work/rest cycles.
Sunday, May 06, 2007
Spring is sprung
Friday, May 04, 2007
"Deserve Victory"
I work in a fairly typical American office. In this office we have "several" motivational pictures on the wall. We seem to get "motivational presents" as well. For example i have this little wire guy that balances on a brass "razor's edge" with a plaque underneath that reads "The best way to predict the future is to create it."
Um, OK...
Regardless of that, it seems that America has been covered with motivational messages enough that people, despite the smarmy nature of their presentation, pat some degree of attention to them. That being the case, I've made one that needs to be hung in Washington, but I'll show you guys because your my pals ad it's Friday.
The quote is from Terry Goodkind and the picture is from D-Day but it think it makes a subtle point worth emphasizing in the halls of power.
Um, OK...
Regardless of that, it seems that America has been covered with motivational messages enough that people, despite the smarmy nature of their presentation, pat some degree of attention to them. That being the case, I've made one that needs to be hung in Washington, but I'll show you guys because your my pals ad it's Friday.
The quote is from Terry Goodkind and the picture is from D-Day but it think it makes a subtle point worth emphasizing in the halls of power.
Proving a point
The environmental movement is, at heart, well intentioned. They are also blissfully unaware of the true scope of the environment and for that reason they will always fail. Always.
The reason for that inevitable failure is that they are fighting against change. Entropy, if you will. They, as conservationist, are expending their energy to make sure resources don't change. Yet, gradualism will continue to alter things, through natural forces, causing change.
Today's example:
Think about this for a second. What do you need to have to make ice? Water and below freezing temperatures. So are they going to be able to change the temperature? No. Likewise, how are you really saving a glacier when you protect it from rain, but can't change the temperature? The very fact that rain, a natural process mind you, would cause the glacier to melt sort of indicates that the glacier isn't in the temperature state needed to stay a glacier.
Now, I can understand trying to protect it in the sense that it's the ski lodge thats paying for all of this but you still have to scratch your head at the mindset that tries to protect glaciers from rain with reflective tarps.
For what it's worth, we've had 7 major glacial periods in the last 650,000 years. We've also had 9 interglacial, or dare we say "global warming", episodes. Likewise, since we are in a interglacial episode, it'll continue to get warmer until the fateful day comes that it starts getting cooler.
These cycles are natural. Whether or not we speed them up is a debatable subject but the fact remains that even if we did everything that Al Gore seems to think that we need to do, it'll still get warmer until the one day get cooler, the sea levels will rise and then fall, we'll still have storms and volcanoes and hurricanes and tornadoes, and finally, species of animals will continue to rise up and they'll continue to die.
Change is inevitable, surviving it isn't. Hopefully our naturalist get that point because we might need their help in evolving past those changes before we go the way of the dodo.
The reason for that inevitable failure is that they are fighting against change. Entropy, if you will. They, as conservationist, are expending their energy to make sure resources don't change. Yet, gradualism will continue to alter things, through natural forces, causing change.
Today's example:
Workers began stretching a huge tarpaulin Thursday over parts of Germany's highest mountain in a battle against the effects of global warming on the snow-covered peak -- a process that leaves environmentalists sceptical.
About 9,000 square meters (97,000 square feet) of reflective foil has been spread across a ski area on one side of the 2,962 meter (116,600 foot) high Zugspitze in the northern Alps near Garmisch-Partenkirchen.
This year, the Zugspitzbahn company, which finances the cover-up from revenues from its ski-lift, gondola-lifts and restaurant, ordered 50 percent more tarpaulin than last year. The tarps were unpacked one week earlier than usual following a particularly mild winter and the hottest April in recent history.
"The cover keeps off the heat and channels away rainwater," said Manfred Haas, who manages a team that grooms the ski area with bulldozers and graders. "Every autumn we make note of where the glacier has melted the most and cover those places the following spring."
Think about this for a second. What do you need to have to make ice? Water and below freezing temperatures. So are they going to be able to change the temperature? No. Likewise, how are you really saving a glacier when you protect it from rain, but can't change the temperature? The very fact that rain, a natural process mind you, would cause the glacier to melt sort of indicates that the glacier isn't in the temperature state needed to stay a glacier.
Now, I can understand trying to protect it in the sense that it's the ski lodge thats paying for all of this but you still have to scratch your head at the mindset that tries to protect glaciers from rain with reflective tarps.
For what it's worth, we've had 7 major glacial periods in the last 650,000 years. We've also had 9 interglacial, or dare we say "global warming", episodes. Likewise, since we are in a interglacial episode, it'll continue to get warmer until the fateful day comes that it starts getting cooler.
These cycles are natural. Whether or not we speed them up is a debatable subject but the fact remains that even if we did everything that Al Gore seems to think that we need to do, it'll still get warmer until the one day get cooler, the sea levels will rise and then fall, we'll still have storms and volcanoes and hurricanes and tornadoes, and finally, species of animals will continue to rise up and they'll continue to die.
Change is inevitable, surviving it isn't. Hopefully our naturalist get that point because we might need their help in evolving past those changes before we go the way of the dodo.
Thursday, May 03, 2007
Hey, since I have to study, you do too
Bask in the greatness of the Class Cephalopoda!!!!
ARRRRGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!
Writing the Rep
I've written my congressman or rep a total a 5 times in my life. All five times it's worked out favorably and I've received a response. Hopefully this continues the trend.
As a total side note, to have Marchant as my Rep after years of being stuck with Martin Frost is a freaking dream. I hated Martin Frost.
I wanted to take a moment to ask you to consider a relatively paltry but particularly irritating development that I have become aware of.
PBS funds many types programs and normally receives very little notice with the sheer volume of network and cable options that are available. However, much of their content does look at issues at a deeper level than that of their commercial counterparts. As a result, I find that when they have a program slated that is of any interest to me, I will usually go out of my way to view it.
I don't always agree with their assessments or even their taste in programming but they provide a richer and more through depth of scope in that they don't have to focus on "selling me soap" in between 15 minute segments.
It is for that reason that I am particularly disappointed and unhappy with PBS's decision to pull and refuse to allow the PBS funded program "Islam vs. Islamists: Voices from the Muslim Center" to air. The reasoning that has been offered is that the piece is alarmist and it was too long. That may very well be the case, but that reason is based around opinion. I find many of PBS's programs to be too long, to broad, too biased and too boring to tolerate but I have a every effective way of dealing with that: I don't watch it.
This show may be utter tripe. It may unfairly depict people of the Islamic faith. It may do a lot of things. However, for PBS to expend over $600,000 dollars in taxpayers money and then not show it for "length" or "run time" is laughable. To not show it for emotional posturing, or for political correctness, is deplorable and wasteful. However to constrain the release of this show, and then further not allow for any distribution of the show or it's footage, for reasons that are ideological is nothing short censorship.
If the people payed for it, why are we not seeing it? Furthermore, if it's unfit for air then don't we trust the FCC to do it's job? Finally, if it is fit for air and it asks hard questions that make a segment of our country uncomfortable, do we really think the reason for that discomfort and the ability for the American people to handle it is so diminished that we have to trust PBS to make decisions for us when they themselves spent the money to make it?
Respectfully, this is a case of political stupidity run amok and a time when the question of "Why aren't moderate Islamic believers stepping forward to bring their faith away from the fringe" is a very relevant question for Americans to both ask and be informed of. If PBS is now scared to ask that question; fine. But I would encourage you to inquire about what is being done to free this show up to allow it to be shown by a willing party who has the guts to ask such a question.
If not, if PBS is unwilling to allow that, they need to seriously reconsider their structure and conceptual vetting process because $600,000 can make a bigger difference somewhere else than sitting in a dark room.
Respectfully,
Rob B
As a total side note, to have Marchant as my Rep after years of being stuck with Martin Frost is a freaking dream. I hated Martin Frost.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











