Monday, June 01, 2009

Pravda's gone dark .... UPDATED

... but the gist of the story is here ....

... First the population in America was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education based on pop culture rather than the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas than the drama in D.C. that directly affects their lives. True. They care more for their right to check down a McDonald's burger or a Burger King burger than for their constitutional rights and then they turn around and lecture us in Russia about our rights and about our democracy? Pride blind the foolish.

That line sticks out to me: Pride blind the foolish. We're arguing over things we should not be arguing about. The other line that sticks out to me is the substandard education based on pop culture rather than the classics. I was with George Wythe University who was the guy who was really the mentor to Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson had a way of education, and it's all based in the classics. At George Wythe University, they only have textbooks. They only use the classics. I've seen the difference.

Pravda goes on and says, "Then their faith in God was destroyed until their churches, all tens of thousands of different branches and denominations were for the most part little more than Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant megapreachers were more than happy to sell their souls in flocks to be on the winning side of one pseudoMarxist politician or another. Their flock may complain but when explained that they would be on the winning side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes of earthly power. The final collapse came with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in the past three months have been truly impressive. His spending and money‑printing has been record‑setting, not just in America's short history but in the world. If this keeps up for more than another year ‑‑ and there is no sign that it will not ‑‑ America will best resemble the Weimar Republic and, at worst, Zimbabwe." ....


I don't know whether Pravda's gone blank because of the sensation of the editorial ... maybe their translator's are on strike.

It is, nonetheless, striking.

My bold.

UPDATE:

They're back, but without gravitas.

Headline Pravda:

  • Religious dogmas destroy human sex life

Labels: ,

Friday, February 27, 2009

2009 Bumpersticker Award Winner

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Well...

Our government swore in a known tax cheat for treasury secretary yesterday.

It's a damn good thing that corrupt McChimpy Bushitler is out of office, eh?

Labels:

Friday, January 09, 2009

Who's hungry, now?

Friday, October 17, 2008

Welcome wagon ....

Wednesday, October 01, 2008

This is really, really, really creepy ...

It reminds me of an old classic Hepburn/Tracy flick "Keeper of the Flame" (1942).

ALL HEIL!

All shall be revealed.

O!

Labels: , ,

Sunday, September 28, 2008

ROVE ... YOU MAGNIFICENT BASTARD!

Labels: ,

Monday, August 25, 2008

State of Society:

Poor.

And declining.

Question for users of that site? Why the fuck did you get married? Seriously. No one holds a gun to your head in this country.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Spaced!


"Just call her Nancy the Navigator.

“I have always loved longitude,” Nancy Pelosi says before breaking into laughter. “I love latitude; it’s in the stars. But longitude, it’s about time. ... Time and clocks and all the rest of that have always been a fascination for me.” ........."

Labels:

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Evel Canuck




This is the sort of picture that you should always keep hidden from your mother.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, June 06, 2008

S.T.F.U ... I mean ... really ... just S.T.F.U.




... A divorce lawyer from Lethbridge [Alberta] with a second-rate patronage job just ordered a Canadian pastor to stop communicating to anyone, ever, about gays. Not to stop "hate speech" -- whatever that malleable legal definition is. She just told him to shut up, period.

And then she orders that Rev. Boissoin and his group are:
...prohibited from making disparaging remarks in the future about Dr. Lund or Dr. Lund's witnesses relating to their involvement in this complaint..

Again, not banned from "hate speech", whatever that is today; but banned from disparaging remarks about Lund, an anti-Christian activist, who now is "protected" not just from Rev. Boissoin's alleged anti-gay remarks, but from his political criticism of his own tormentor. Apparently, being a busy-body human rights complainant-of-fortune is a new "protected ground" of hate speech. Become one, and no-one can ever say anything "disparaging" about you again. Ever. Not even in an e-mail. ...


I'll do it, and I'll say it:

IMO, Lori Andreachuk is a moron.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, May 22, 2008

FORE !!!!

MONTREAL - The crucifix is out. The hijab is in. Preaching reconciliation with Quebec's minorities, the long-awaited Bouchard-Taylor report on the integration of immigrants recommends removing the crucifix from the Quebec legislature, allowing students to keep wearing their hijab, kippas, turbans and even kirpans in class, and banning prayers at city council meetings. ...


"interculturalism": It's not even a word yet!

"fore": (used as a cry of warning to persons on a course who are in danger of being struck by the balls)

Labels: ,

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Headliners ....

If you rub it, does it grant you three wishes?

Labels:

Thursday, March 13, 2008

"That guy needs a hug..."

This is probably some of the greatest sports commentary I've ever heard.

Like one of the commenter notes, that guy should be used for every major sporting event commentary.

Labels:

Thursday, January 10, 2008

I couldn't help myself ...

I watched the FNC South Carolina debates tonight.

Who is this man ... Ron Paul?

The poor bastard's been blinkered.

Labels: , ,

Monday, January 07, 2008

An Intentional Slip-up?

I've been a listener to 102.1 KDGE "The Edge" ever since I moved to Dallas out of college. Their music style is pretty much all I listened to since I was about 15 years old.

About two years ago, they went to a talk format in the morning (as all stations did, apparently) using Lex & Terry. Since I never could get into their shtick, I usually listened to ESPN radio in the mornings but during the afternoon commute, the station would flip back to 102.1 for some modern rock music. That means that in the morning when I'd turn on the car, the radio would be set to KDGE. Which brings me to what Lex or Terry said this morning... something along the lines of "this station (The Edge) will gear itself more towards women... " as they spoke about them being simulcast for a few days on both 102.1 and 97.1 before they moved to 97.1 only.

Recently, another station - The Eagle 97.1 - switched from Latino back to rock. Before the switch to Latino, The Eagle played more classic rock. Now, per Lex and Terry's conversation, they look like they'll play all forms of rock. This leads me to believe that after 15 or 16 years, Clear Channel is going to scrap KDGE as we know it.

This makes me sad.

I guess it doesn't make a difference if the same music is moving down the dial but it is something I'll have to get used to. It makes me cringe to think that music that used to be "on the edge" of new will now be used to play Gwen Stafani and Hannah Montana.

I think I might be sick...

Labels: ,

Friday, November 09, 2007

More advice for Hood

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

My scary things list of things that were scary

Since it's Halloween, I decided to list some scary things that both have and haven't happened to me that are in scary movies and books. Please post your own spookiness in the comments. I think there may very well be a whole six degrees of separation thing going on here. SO, with no further delay:

Have you...
~ Ever been attacked by an axe wielding murderer? No
~ Ever been an axe wielding murderer? No
~ Ever met an axe wielding murderer? Yes
~ Ever fired a real gun? Yes
~ Ever fired two real guns at the same time? Yes
~ Ever fired two real guns at a zombie? No
~ Would you like to? Yes
~ What about a lot of the "slow zombies" but you only get six bullets? Nah, I'll pass.
~ Would you like to fire a gun at a vampire? I'll pass
~ What about a werewolf and the bullets are silver? sure
~ What if you fire them only to discover that they aren't silver but instead only silver plated. Would you be pissed? yes
~ Have you ever picked up a hitchhiker? yes
~ Did they stalk you? no
~ If they were really sexy and wanted to stalk you would you really mind that much? I'm not sure
~ When there was a dark corridor and someone suggested splitting up, did you do it? no
~ What if it's Star Trek and your not wearing a red shirt, the other guy is? Ok then
~ If you see an alien egg open, do you look into it? NO
~ Did you ever make out in the woods when your supposed to be a camp counselor? yes
~ Did you expect to survive that? yes
~ Did you score? Ahem... I plead the 5th
~ Did either one of you die a horrible death? No
~ Did you get a cold sore? no
~ Have you ever messed with a pan-dimensional puzzle box that opens the gateway to hell? no
~ Have you ever played Rubik's cube? yes
~ at the DMV? yes
~ Are you sure your answer to "Have you ever messed with a pan-dimensional puzzle box that opens the gateway to hell?" is correct? no
~ Have you ever been in a scary situation where it's obvious that you aren't the good looking one and most probably the comic relief of the group? yes
~ Have you ever played D&D? yes
~ If yes, have you ever gotten laid? yes
~ Have you ever sold your soul to get laid because your D&D habit impedes that process? no
~ do you know someone who has? yes
~ did they do it over the Internet? yes

So, in just a few brief questions we can see that I'm just one plot twist from a horror movie plot. What about you? Have any questions we should add?

Labels:

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Close your eyes and picture Hillary! in a pale blue seersucker suit accessorized with white patent leather belt and shoes.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

We Report, You Decide

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Labels:

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

I just knew there had to be a reason why he's so cranky all the time ....

Labels:

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Progress?

I'm not a parent (yet). But a lot of our readers are.

What are your thoughts (as parents) on this?

My thoughts? If that is progress, I'd rather not have any.

Labels:

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Possibly the worst thing i have ever heard...

Cop who fell on the job sues family...
CASSELBERRY - In January, 1-year-old Joey Cosmillo wandered into the backyard and fell into the family pool. When his mother hauled him out, he wasn't breathing. Rescuers were able to bring him back to life, but he suffered severe brain damage and cannot walk, talk or even swallow.

Now, his family faces another burden: One of the rescuers, Casselberry police Sgt. Andrea Eichhorn, is suing, alleging the family left a puddle of water on the floor that afternoon, causing her to slip and fall.
Wow. Just wow.
Eichhorn arrived a few minutes later. As she stepped into the room where rescuers were working on the boy, she slipped and went down on one knee, then stood back up, according to Richard Cosmillo.
Eichhorn, a 12-year department veteran, would not discuss the suit. Her attorney said those benefits, paid by the city's workers' compensation carrier, were not enough. The suit seeks an unspecified amount of money.

Eichhorn, he said, is a victim. Her knee aches, and she will likely develop arthritis.

If the Cosmillos had made their pool baby-proof, police would not have been called to the scene, there would have been no water on the floor, and Eichhorn would not have hurt herself, he said.
Bad folk. I hope Eichhorn and her attorney both live long enough to regret this, but people like that tend to not really care about anything other than themselves anyway.

Labels: ,

Sunday, October 07, 2007

The eternal debate

Because you "can" do something, does it mean that you "should" do something? Consider that question as you look at this.
A scientist who built a synthetic chromosome from laboratory chemicals is expected to announce the creation of a new species, the first new artificial life form on Earth, British newspaper The Guardian reported Sunday.

The new species is a form of bacteria, and the announcement, which could come as early as Monday, is expected to provoke a substantial ethical debate about the manufacturing of life forms in a test tube, as well the dangers posed by introducing a new species, The Guardian reported.

Craig Venter, the genetics specialist who spearheaded the landmark breakthrough and heads the J. Craig Venter Institute in Rockville, Md., where the research was conducted, said the new species could lead to new energy sources and new methods for combatting global warming.

"We are going from reading our genetic code to the ability to write it," Venter told The Guardian. "That gives us the hypothetical ability to do things never contemplated before," he said.

For example, the bacteria could be capable of absorbing carbon monoxide, a possible solution to global warming, Venter said.

While I understand the desire for science to advance it's understanding of life and the genetic chemical engineering of life, let's look at one thing. If you make a bacteria that eats carbon monoxide and it works and the planet cools that's just spiffy. However, if you make a bacteria that eats carbon monoxide and it mutates, as bacteria often do, and it begins to eat CO2, just one oxygen more, then plants die follwed by us dying. That would be not so good. If you make a bacteria that mutates and begins to eat just Ozone, or just "O", we loose our UV protection and get cancer and die. If you make a bacteria that mutates and eats carbon, we die. Ect, ect, ect....

Get the point?

Nature doesn't exactly treat us with kid gloves now, but do we really need to aid her in wiping us out?

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Not Mineral Porn



This is calcium oxalate. It is what has formed on a micro scale in my kidneys. It is what Is causing me no end of discomfort right now. If is what convinced me to drink over 12 fl oz of Bacardi rum and 36oz of Rose's Mojito mix before 8am this morning. It is the reason that I an currently sweating like a stuck pig and wondering if I can drag myself it to my 45. (just kidding, but not by much)

More than likely, it is tied to hyperthyroidism, of which my family has a history and of which I'm going to need to discuss with a doctor. In the meantime, post things that will make me laugh because I heard that laughter is the best medicine.

Labels:

Monday, October 01, 2007

I'll let the link speak for itself.

Michelle Malkin » Miller Lite-approved: Toddlers at the Folsom Street Fair

Now remember, rubes - If your conservative sensibilities have been violated, it's probably because you're not enlightened enough.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

You know, I have to say it....


This is not a photoshop.
Superstar Tom Cruise heads an international cast as Col. Claus von Stauffenberg, the aristocratic German officer who led the heroic attempt to bring down the Nazi regime and end the war by planting a bomb in Hitler's bunker. The "July 20 Plot" on Hitler's life is one of the most heroic but least known episodes of World War II. Severely wounded in combat, Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg returns from Africa to join the German Resistance and help create Operation Valkyrie, the complex plan that will allow a shadow government to replace Hitler's once he is dead. But fate and circumstance conspire to thrust Stauffenberg from one of many in the plot to a double-edged central role. Not only must he lead the coup and seize control of his nation's government... He must kill Hitler himself.
Tom Cruise is going to kill Hitler. Just let that sink in.

It gets better, it seems that Germany has said a collective "Hell no" to allowing him to film in the fatherland because the German Defense Ministry fears Cruise will use the film to promote Scientology.
Defense Ministry spokesman Harald Kammerbauer said the film makers "will not be allowed to film at German military sites if Count Stauffenberg is played by Tom Cruise, who has publicly professed to being a member of the Scientology cult."

Cruise - a long-time member of the bizarre religion - plays Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg, leader of the attempt to assassinate Hitler with a briefcase bomb.

German Defense Minister Franz-Josef Jung believes that Cruise's presence in the film will prevent an "authentic portrayal" of the events of July 20, 1944, when a bomb exploded in Hitler's 'Wolf's Lair' headquarters but failed to kill him.
It's kinda like Top Gun, with Val Kilmer as the Germans.


"You're everyone's problem. That's because every time you go up in the air, you're unsafe. I don't like you because you're dangerous."
Yes, Mav, you're a Scientology loving, home ultrasound having, Katie hypnotising fool, the Fatherland want no part of your shenanigans. Us Americans, were still just asking WTF is up with the placenta eating thing because that was just a little too weird. Seriously, man: Seek help.

Labels:

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Ok... and now for something completely different

I found this site and .... Wow!

Seriously, that's all I got. For the link impaired:
What is Christian Domestic Discipline?

A domestic discipline marriage is one in which one partner in the marriage is given authority over the other and has the means to back the authority, usually by spanking.

A Christian Domestic Discipline marriage is one that is set up according to Biblical standards; that is, the husband is the authority in the household. The wife is submissive to her husband as is fit in the Lord and her husband loves her as himself. He has the ultimate authority in his household, but it is tempered with the knowledge that he must answer to God for his actions and decisions. He has the authority to spank his wife for punishment, but in real CDD marriages this is taken very seriously and usually happens only rarely. CDD is so much more than just spanking. It is the husband loving the wife enough to guide and teach her, and the wife loving the husband enough to follow his leadership. A Christian marriage embodies true romance and a Christian man a true hero.

Though this seems unusual in today's United States, this kind of marriage has been practiced throughout history and is still practiced in many parts of the world today.
I consider this one slightly dumbfounding minus the term "slightly."

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, September 14, 2007

Did you know...?

That in Russia, driving on the streets will raise your heartrate by 150%, pedestrians do NOT have the rightaway, the lines on the roads are just "guidelines" or "suggestions" and that the only apparent speed limits are those that might allow you to brake in time before plowing into a car/bus/person/building in front of you?

This fun fact has been brought to you by Hood in Russia!TM

Labels: ,

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Seeing Spots ... [UPDATED ... twice]

How to connect the dots and paint by numbers.

You think you've got propaganda problems.

UPDATE: The children's CBBC seems to have dropped the second link which gave a definition for "Al-Qaeda", so ...

"paint by numbers" would read:

Al-Qaeda has been accused of being behind a series of attacks and bombings since its formation in the late 1980s.

Because of this, it is classed as a terrorist organisation by the UK government.

Members are followers of Islam but they have very extreme beliefs that are different from those of many Muslims.

They believe they are fighting a holy war (jihad) against enemies of their religion.

Al-Qaeda hopes its attacks will make Western countries treat Muslims differently in areas like the Middle East, the Balkans and Chechnya .

People have joined the group from many countries including Britain.

They operate internationally but are thought to be strongest in Arab countries.


UPDATE the second: at PJM

Labels: ,

Monday, September 10, 2007

Global Warming: Today's fear mongering moment

Today, the San Francisco Chronicle had a spiffy editorial about how global warming needs to be the political priority of this next election candidates. In that article, they had sweet nuggets of wisdom like "If unchecked, it (global warming) will threaten our national security, stress our economy and degrade our quality of life in so many ways." They also conclude that "Our willingness to confront this unprecedented heating of the planet is a test of our moral obligation to our children and their children." Of course, it's not "unprecedented" but why quibble. Let's carry on.

So all of those running for office need to be enviro-warriors because "The world effectively lost eight years in the effort to apply a brake to climate change while the Bush administration slowly evolved from denial to foot dragging in response to a strong scientific consensus that human activity - namely, the consumption of fossil fuels - was putting life on Earth on a collision course with disaster."

That's right. I am, to some degree according to the editorial, the reason that we are all going to die. See, not only do I burn fossil fuels in my car but I work for an oil and gas company that finds the fossil fuels to burn in your cars. All of this is because I am failing to fulfill my "moral obligation to our children and their children."

Really, we're all little thugish eco-nazis with suvs. After all there is consensus. The scientist have consensus. WTF is our problem? Look at this.
Lonnie Thompson, geology professor from Ohio State, showed measurements and photos of shrinking glaciers around the globe to underscore the damage from greenhouse gases. The thawing that has exposed plants and an "iceman" carcass for the first time in 5,200 years is a clear indication that something is terribly amiss, he suggested.

Ben Santer, a physicist and atmospheric science at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, was ostracized by some members of Congress a decade ago for daring to contribute to the International Panel on Climate Change finding that human activity was probably an influence on global warming. Ten years later, a growing body of evidence has vindicated Santer, and he speaks without fear of political retribution.

"We are," he told the editors, "irrevocably changing the climate." The debate is no longer about whether the Earth is warming at a disturbing rate, but by how much. "We're spinning the wheel," Santer said. By 2100, the "most likely scenario" - a 1 in 4 chance - is that planet temperatures would increase by 2 to 2.5 degrees centigrade, he said.

Terry Root, a biologist at the Woods Institute for the Environment, said the planet already is "right at the edge of a mass extinction event." There is ample evidence of species changing migration habits and otherwise seeking new habitat because of climate change. If temperatures were to rise more than 4 degrees centigrade by century's end, she said, 40 percent of known species in the world would become extinct.


You know, I think at this point we just need to panic and thrash about. I'll lead.



"AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"


OK...

I feel better now.

Lets continue.

So why shouldn't we all go jump off a cliff? Seriously, let's just go get our kids toss them off high buildings and then jump right after them, right?

Well, I guess it's because in global warming they typically forget to tell the whole story. Half the story can be fun, don't get me wrong. In fact, in some Hollywood movies it might be preferable, but sometimes it helps to see the whole story. Sometimes.

For example, that "sea levels rising" thing... Yeah that happens. Look at earth history for a sec. It's called Transgression and Regression. Of course, it's not like the earth doesn't change anyway. Click on the picture and look at this.



It's a image of the planet of the last couple plus billion years. Take a good look and notice how much it's changed. Notice that there were times with glaciers and without glaciers. There were times with nearly no exposed land and times with a lot of exposed land. then think about this:
ALL OF THAT HAPPENED WITHOUT ANY HUMAN INTERFERENCE.

I know, freaky isn't it. It's like the planet has systems that function independent of us. It also shows us that just like we weren't in control back then, we aren't in control now and we probably won't be in control any time in the future.

Also, there is the fact that humans have been kicking around as homo sapiens for about 10,000 years. That's not a really long track record compared to something like the shark which has been around for about 360 million years. Likewise, scientists normally don't give you the info that 99% of all the species that have ever existed are now extinct. For perspective, let's play a game. I'm going to give you a list:

cats, dogs, pigs, chickens, cows, donkeys, spotted owls, whales, bald eagles, otters
iguanas, spiders, roaches, ants, carp, geckos, dolphins, meerkats, turtles, hamsters
canaries, wolves, salmon, seals, sea lions, manatees, falcons, sparrows, doves, mice
sharks, armadillos, geese, ducks, horses, beetles, snakes, worms, termites, rats
parrots, quail, humans, grasshoppers, caribou, lice, ticks, mites, crabs, scorpions

Ok, there is a list of fifty animals. Pick one type and imagine that all the other ones die. Over time, that's pretty much what happens. Either a life form evolves or it dies. Actually, I doubled the odds of survivorship because I got lazy and only listed 50 but The same thing goes for us. Hey, I'm a giver. Still, either we'll evolve or we'll die out.

I know that the whole story isn't as "sexy" and it won't get you on the news as often but these scientist should already know this. However, it's politically, egotistically and financially expedient to omit the whole story and the balance that it provides because it doesn't fit the politics of what the politicians want you to hear.

The message they are playing is the same "Pick me because your too stupid to stop this but we can by making rules for you, the stupid people." That might be the case, if what they were saying was totally true. However, it's not.

What's worse is that there are hundreds of other things that could wipe out life on this planet in a matter or days, but they don't platform on those because that would cause hysteria. Instead, we'll scare you about a process that takes hundreds of years to raise the ocean leve 7 inches in order to control your life today. A process that we can't stop and don't understand but will tell you that we can prevent despite the fact that stopping the process is totally physically, energetically, biologically, geologically and chemically impossible to control.

Pardon me, if I don't drink the kool aide on that one.

(BTW, for the creationist: Genesis 9:8-11 "8 Then God told Noah and his sons, 9 “I hereby confirm my covenant with you and your descendants, 10 and with all the animals that were on the boat with you—the birds, the livestock, and all the wild animals—every living creature on earth. 11 Yes, I am confirming my covenant with you. Never again will floodwaters kill all living creatures; never again will a flood destroy the earth.”)


So what to do?

Here's what you do: Accept that your going to die.
No really. I mean it. I can say for a fact that ALL OF YOU WILL DIE with 100% scientific accuracy.

Now decide how you want to try to live? If you want to live trying to hold on to the current climate, scared of change, bound in fear then by all means vote for these fear mongers. It won't work but maybe it will make you feel better. I doubt it but who knows. It's like putting a paper bag over your head, it might help.

Of course, the other option is to see that the things that we build and the stuff that we learn will probably be our best bet at an answer for how humans can take on the changes of a world that will change anyway and allow us to adapt. In that, we're better off if we understand that the car of today is the horse of yesterday and will probably become a novelty to whatever we develop tomorrow.

Or, there's always panic!!!!

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Hood ... check your airline tickets ....

Nepal's state-run airline has confirmed that it sacrificed two goats to appease a Hindu god, following technical problems with one of its aircraft.
We are not amused.

Labels:

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

Racism as an extension of Stupid: A systemic crap ball of absolute idiocy

For those who currently surf CNN, one of today's stories has to do with racial discord, violence and charges in the town of Jena, Louisiana. The story is linked here and is truly a train wreck of stupidity on many levels. I'd suggest reading it because I won't mass post it but to sum up the relevant points:

~ A group of black kids decide to sit under a tree that the white kids normally hang out under.
~ The white kids hang nooses there which the black kids find there the next day.
~ The white kids responsible are suspended for 3 days
~ Racial tension in the school increases, fights both on and off campus happen
~ The school system has the DA address the school
~ The schools main academic building gets torched, as in 'arson'
~ Six students "reportedly" jump one kid and beat him until he is unconscious
~ The six are arrested and face charges
~ Parents of all the kids say their sons are being railroaded via Jim Crow Justice

So where to start?

The whole thing got touched off because, let's be honest, the kids hanging the nooses were trying to be dicks. Was that racial motivated? Hell yeah, it was as some level. Those kids may have deserved more or less time out of school based on your personal opinion but as an educational administration you know they have rules regarding race relations and common sense that those kids broke. They showed a major lack of judgment in thinking that idea was "cute" or "harmless" in today's social environment. So, I don't have any problem with those kids getting punished and would point out that if it were one of my sons, there would have been some punishment at home that would make a 3 day suspension seem like a vacation.

What happened from that point was where the pure stupidity stepped up. Should those kids have been ostracized in school? That's a debatable social theory depending on whether your pro-enforcement or pro-rehabilitation. I can honestly say that they could expect to be fairly hated when they get off suspension. However, should their actions light off a powder keg with other students who weren't involved? No. And yet, it did. In my estimation it did for 2 reasons. The first is because black culture has not accepted that they are an easy mark when it comes to getting a reaction. The second is that schools and society's do an exceptionally poor job of handling teen boys and violence. Those two thing let 3 stupid kids melt down a whole school.

Look racism is a problem in America. Period. And I know that some people can't accept it but it's not a one sided problem. I'm sorry, I've worked in predominately black environments and in predominately Hispanic environments. The result surprised me because you guys seem to dog each other and, even funnier, you just assumed that I agreed. The irony is that I don't. Sure, the races are different as genetics would tell you but I haven't seen that as any type of limiting factor in any type of human endeavor, much less a sign of superiority. However, that's something I had to learn from experience with individuals because culture sure doesn't teach it.

White culture, for example, seems to say that I'm supposed to help every other culture out because it seems that every other culture needs help and I'm of the culture that's supposed to provide it. That was news to me considering that when my dad left, my mom was making 14k and I was having to hot glue gun the soles back on to my shoes. Still, it seems that "I'm responsible because I'm the man." I also found out that I'm responsible for slavery and I took Texas from the Mexicans who stole it from the Spanish who took it from the Indians. The fact that 1/16 of me is Indian doesn't supposedly void me of the white guilt for the Trail of Tears or Wounded Knee, either. While all of that is fun to learn as a heir apparent to "the man" franchise, I believe that I can correctly assume that several other boys have since learned that they are the heirs to being the "aggrieved black man" or the "downtrodden Latino" or whatever bullshit society is pedaling.

As a result, black culture, from a white perspective, is so predictable that you could almost write a scientific law of universal response: Something like, "Any reference to the KKK, Jim Crow, Slavery or the use of the "N" word by anyone not Black is guaranteed a negative response at twice the energy level expressed and grows exponentially as the number of black recipients of said utterance is increased." Disagree? You think it was a accident that In Die Hard 3 that it was just accepted wisdom that Bruce Willis' character was going to get a serious ass beating, if not die, for wearing a lunch board saying "I hate Niggers?" Why is that? Furthermore, why is that acceptable wisdom? Have you ever stopped to consider the response if you drop a black character in the middle of white America with the counter sign of "I hate Crackers" or Whitey or Jews or whatever? Is that a guaranteed ass beating or death sentence under today's conventional wisdom? Not hardly.

The point is that regardless of how you feel about it, and in today's PC world none the less, all it takes is saying "nigger" and people get wound up past all conventional wisdom and personal responsibility. As a result, they lose the power of initiative because their emotions dictate over their reason, more often than not. Who is the exception to that? The people who define themselves and others as individuals.

Racism will continue to be a problem for one reason: People employ it to define who they are and who other people are because it's easier than being an individual or treating people as individuals. Society, and more specifically their parents, failed these kids in not enforcing that.

The second issue is that society at large has a horrible grasp of what a man is, much less how to raise one, much less how to deal with a immature one. Violence is just one aspect where society fails miserably. Being a man is about understanding your value, your strengths, your weaknesses and how you allow those things to interact with those around you. Today's kids are barely taught to make sound decisions, typically isolated from risk, over protected from consequences and totally uncoached in understanding the power of their actions.

There is a reason that martial arts can often market it's self for teaching responsibility and respect. The reason is that it is incredibly stupid to be disrespectful to a person who is able to break bricks with their head. The interesting factor is that it is typically the person who can break bricks with their head that is the most respectful to the people in the room that pose him no threat for a reason that most people don't get. A teacher is typically the most respectful of the power that he has learned, but he has also learned that the true power is in the choice to not put himself in the position to have to use it because of the damage that it can cause. He understands the consequence to action.

Some kids today need to have their asses tossed around a dojo once or twice to realize that violence is just a tool. It can be effective but it can also run contrary to what you are trying to accomplish. In plain English, kids today see violence as the final step in a confrontation when it isn't. The aftermath of a confrontation still has to be dealt with and eventually the root cause of the confrontation before it is resolved. However, most boys are never taught that so they believe that "kicking ass" will fix the problem. Wrong. That might be a step, but normally there are other things that could be done before, or during, that confrontation that would be better than unchecked aggression. Society, and specifically these kid's parents, have failed to teach them, and possibly understand themselves, that when the only tool you have is a hammer every problem looks like a nail.

When you place this all together the result is what you see. Kids that are in trouble, kids that are in pain, kids that are in discord, a community wrecked, fear mongers circling the wagons and everyone generally unimpressed with the whole thing because it could have been prevented. However, I want to take a second to say that for once in the news, the school system in this seems to have acted responsibly. They alone addressed the issues along each step. They alone took preventive action. In short, they are the only ones I see in the whole thing that tried to defuse things.

Where all of this will go is beyond me but the point that we need to take away from it is this: fixing the problem of racism doesn't lie with the schools. They tried. It lies with society and parenting. We need to better coach our own kids on living in a equal society of individuals and educate them to the nature of their actions, including but not limited to violence.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

For your consideration...

This is George Jones

This is Jim Carey


And they're never in the same place at the same time....

Think about it.

Has Canada been cloning?

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

It's another slow news day ...

So, I'll just leave it right there.

Labels:

Friday, August 10, 2007

Friday's question of the day

When I was a kid, and I'm talking little here, I have vague memories of watching the animated film "The Hobbit" on TV. While nothing in particular really happened during the movie that I can remember, I do remember laying in my bed, with the bathroom door ajar for a night light, and being absolutely petrified that a goblin or gollum or a dragon was going to eat me. The idea that something would actually want to eat me had been foreign up to that point and I wasn't liking where that idea was going.

To make matters worse, I remember my dad coming into the room, but I had my back to the door so I didn't know it was him, and being so scared that I wanted to scream but was unable to.

That movie freaked me out.

Ironically, because of video games and computers, my kids can look at something like Lord of the Ring's more scary parts and go "Pfft, that's not real, it's computer animation." It seems they are grown up to know that the box in the living room doesn't reflect reality.

Still, today's question is what movie, or TV show, freaked you out as a kid?

C'mon, spill it. You know that more than just the Wizard of Oz freaked you out.

Update:
What was I thinking? How could any of this possibly been scary?




Labels:

Thursday, August 09, 2007

Rob beat me to it ...

but, what horrifies me is Riehl's seeming reluctance to post ...
I've wrestled with making this post, based upon a tip. ....
I'm glad he did, and I hope it goes viral.

Maybe it has.

Bizarre, to say the least. True? Would Amanda lie?

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

In 2005, in Texas....

... 0 people died from salmonella poisoning
... 2 people died of syphilis
... 8 people died from HPV
... 8 People were attacked by sharks, none of the attacks were fatal
... 30 people died of lip cancer
... 47 people died from child birth
... 59 people died of TB
... 72 people died from meningitis
... 74 Texas born soldiers died in Iraq
... 152 people died from surgical complications
... 633 people died of lung cancer
... 1108 people died from Parkinson's disease
... 1407 people were murdered
... 2290 people died by suicide
... 3198 people died from the flu
... 3504 people died in automobile accidents, of those 1569 were alcohol related.
... 4209 people died of stomach cancer
... 4331 people died from Alzheimer's
... 5426 people died from diabetes
... 16309 people died of colon cancer
... 40091 people died of heart disease
... 48305 people died of lung cancer

We spend millions of dollars trying to avert these numbers. Hundreds of thousands of volunteers give their time to "increase awareness" and "educate toward prevention" and lobby for legislative controls in order to try to avert these numbers. There are TV shows and news stories and telethons and 10k runs and jump rope pledge drives and more done to try to make a difference in curtailing these deaths. People beg and plead and suffer and work and toil and fight and die in their efforts aligned to diverting these numbers.

We look at them and we see that struggle as noble. We put on out LiveStrong bracelet, look at our Prostate Cancer awareness lapen pin, grab our pink ribbon coffee cup and jump into our "Support the troops" stickered cars. We agree. Painful, avoidable death should be stopped. Seriously, who can support it. Even our criminals are given a court mandated, pain free lethal injection.

So if we can all be on the same side on this. If Texans common humanity recognizes the need to decrease suffering and death as much as possible, then I have one more stat to give you.

In Texas, in 2005 alone, there were 77,374 babies killed due to elective abortion.

SEVENTY SEVEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY FOUR.
In one year.

That disgusts me.

If we are truly against pointless suffering and needless death then there is a reality we have to face: This "bullshit" they call a debate between "reproductive rights and morality and women's choice" has resulted in over 2,493,515 deaths in Texas between 1974 and 2005. For scale, that's equivalent to the entire population of Kuwait being killed before they ever breathed.

Abortion is morally, ethically, rationally and logically wrong and the fact that we allow it in the US shows an erosion of the concepts that we supposedly believe and adhere to as a nation.

In one state, 2,439, 515 innocents have been killed for the crime of being inconvenient.

Hitler, and his Nazis, couldn't touch the holocaust we've allowed here in the USA in the name of "choice."

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, August 06, 2007

So you've all been worried...

... about where I've been for so long.

Well, in summary:

To Russia -

A big red building of sorts...

Me in Red Square - proof I'm not a lying capitalist dog

Where's Waldo?

Christ the Savior Cathedral - since rebuilt after torn down by communist a-holes.

That Cathedral is amazing. I've never seen a more ornate building on the inside. Of course I'm not very well traveled. At least not yet.

And the coup de grace...


That's right - a 1000X actual size picture of Scarlett Johansson wrapped around a building. Penelope Cruz was on the other side. I should have backtracked and got the full shot but I was tired and going with the flow of traffic.

********

I've also been in jury duty.

It was a serious case. A 25 year old man was accused of aggrivated sexual assault of a three year old girl.

The case was easy for us as the defense couldn't get a confession tossed out. The trial only lasted for two days and we got to choose the punishment - 25 years in prison. Why not longer? Well, you have to get 12 jurors to agree to the punishment. And there were some in the group that wanted less than 10 or 15 years. Others, like myself, wanted 30-50.

I've been trying to find the case in the local news. Alas I haven't found it. For what it's worth, the accused was an illegal immigrant. Maybe the case didn't fit a greater narrative?

********

I've also played a minor role in planning a wedding. I say minor because the majority of the work is being done by this pretty brunette:

God bless her!

Gotta love her! I know I do.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, August 03, 2007

What we call "not a good day" at work

Here's what happened the last time we let Hood and JR on a well site




Here is a dramatic reenactment of the events that led up to that fateful moment.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, July 27, 2007

The Dallas acetylene tank explosion

Here's a better video, than the one I posted

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

BREAKING - MASSIVE EXPLOSIONS AT A DALLAS WELDING SUPPLY PLANT HAS I-30 AND I-35 SHUT DOWN.

I'LL GET PICTURES UP AS SOON AS I CAN.

Update:





From a personal point of view, watching the video of a building that I've been in fire gas tanks hundreds of feet in the air was something else. I'm sure that CNN, Fox and the like will have the video soon. When they do, let me tell you that it will put Hollywood pyrotechnics to shame. In fact, were I a director, I'd be contacting the Dallas news outlets for footage rights.

Second update:

Here's a map of the area for those not in the Dallas area.

They're reporting bottle flung over a half mile away. In the live shots we were watching I saw a few land on I-30 and on the Houston Street bridge. The structure in the image... Yeah, that's totally gone now.

For the folks in Dallas, since it was a mixture of map gas, oxygen but mostly acetylene tanks that blew up and since they have 35 and 30 totally shut down, I'd avoid the "mix master" today. Traffic out of Dallas is really going to suck today.

If I hear anything new, I'll let you know.

Update:
Let there be video

Labels: , , ,

Lohan: 'I am innocent'

I saw this on CNN and I couldn't pass it up.


Lohan, 21, was arrested early Tuesday in Santa Monica and released on bail for investigation of misdemeanor driving under the influence and with a suspended license, and felony cocaine possession.

"I am innocent... did not do drugs they're not mine. I was almost hit by my assistant Tarin's mom I appreciate everyone giving me my privacy," Lohan wrote in an e-mail to "Access Hollywood" host Billy Bush, the show reported on its Web site Tuesday night.

Police found cocaine in one of the actress' pockets during a pre-booking search, Sgt. Shane Talbot said. Police initially said Lohan was also being booked for investigation of transporting a narcotic but later said she was not.
Now, let me say first, that I'm not an expert. With that being said, this is totally different than Paris Hilton. Paris Hilton could have hurt herself and others with her stupidity but make this distinction: Paris Hilton doesn't get drunk and do stupid stuff because she's running from anything. She does it because she like to get drunk, show some skin, get attention and because she believed that the rules didn't apply to her. She never grew up on her on "Planet Reality" so she was unaware of it.


That picture shows the "oh shit" face of a little girl that just found out that money doesn't protect you from the law. Whether or not she learns from it remains to be seen, but she's doing stupid stuff to have fun, in my opinion.

Lohan, on the other hand, has a grasp on reality, but she is doing everything she can to run from it. Unlike Hilton, she's not trying to have fun for the fun of it. She's trying to get blasted, under the guise of having fun, to avoid the stress that she's under and the fact that she doesn't have anyone who doesn't have their hooks in her that actually cares. They care for what she is more than who she is.

She needs jail time. Paris needed jail to get a slap in the face but Lohan needs it to not end up dead. The "forced vacation" of jail will take her out of her element, away from the people who are whoring off of her and hopefully away from the chemicals that will totally wreck her, if not kill her outright. Unlike both Paris and Brittney, Lohan doesn't have a Mom or Dad to lean on, which is part of her problem, and if she doesn't take on the responsibility of getting herself straightened out she'll probably die young.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Friday, July 20, 2007

Candidate qoutes

This is from Senator Obama on Iraq:
"Well, look, if that's the criteria by which we are making decisions on the deployment of U.S. forces, then by that argument you would have 300,000 troops in the Congo right now — where millions have been slaughtered as a consequence of ethnic strife — which we haven't done," Obama said Thursday in an interview with The Associated Press.

"We would be deploying unilaterally and occupying the Sudan, which we haven't done. Those of us who care about Darfur don't think it would be a good idea," he said.

"Nobody is proposing we leave precipitously. There are still going to be U.S. forces in the region that could intercede, with an international force, on an emergency basis," Obama said between stops on the first of two days scheduled on the New Hampshire campaign trail. "There's no doubt there are risks of increased bloodshed in Iraq without a continuing U.S. presence there."

"It is my assessment that those risks are even greater if we continue to occupy Iraq and serve as a magnate for not only terrorist activity but also irresponsible behavior by Iraqi factions," he said.

"We have not lost a military battle in Iraq. So when people say if we leave, we will lose, they're asking the wrong question," he said. "We cannot achieve a stable Iraq with a military. We could be fighting there for the next decade."

"When you have civil conflict like this, military efforts and protective forces can play an important role, especially if they're under an international mandate as opposed to simply a U.S. mandate. But you can't solve the underlying problem at the end of a barrel of a gun," he said. "There's got to be a deliberate and constant diplomatic effort to get the various factions to recognize that they are better off arriving at a peaceful resolution of their conflicts."

Now, if the role of internationally mandated military efforts are so effective, then why is there genocide in Darfur to begin with? Considering that the attacks that started this civil war happened in 2003 and that the US government was calling on the UN to take action in 2004, 2005, 2006 and this year, why don't we have a mandate, international or otherwise?

The reason is that the UN is slow to issue an political mandate of any type because they cater to the politics of the countries that comprise it's membership. For a reference on that, look at the handling of the Iranian nuke situation by the UN. Deal after deal and proposal after proposal are stalled by China and Russia because of their ties with Iran.

Add to this that most of the countries on the UN are not able to deploy a global force and in some countries case they are truly unwilling to. In that, they wait for the US to act and then rubber stamp, or not, the US's actions. The list of countries that will actually take action are short, the list of countries able of taking effective action are shorter still. For that reason, the list of countries able to take unilateral action can be counted on almost one hand and of those only one does anything of a humanitarian level, that being the US.

Obama is trying to politically differentiate himself from those he is running against and this is a effort all candidates must make, but if this is truly his platform is speaks to a idealism that is naive to the way the international scope of politics are played out. Quite simply, America must be a leader, because if we allow ourselves to become international followers we will become ineffective and yet still expected to do everyone else's heavy lifting.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Fighting the burn

Politics has me a little torched out. I'm glad I'm not in class right now because work has gotten a little weird. I have a new "above me but not my boss" person to break in. (I'm sorta the community bitch in my office.) Mostly, over all I just feel weird.

SO, I'm going to post a little random. It might suck, but then you guys don't have to read it. I figure that it's better than nothing and a lot better than just wigging out.

So here is a video to a song that I made out with a girl to once. I'm not sure why but it's just one of those things that sticks with you. I think it's because the girl looked a lot like Bjork and the song was Bjork. She was a really short girl, like 5'2'. For the record, I'm like 6'2". In the end we only went out twice because her dad was Thai and he didn't want his daughter to date white guys. Great plan moving to Dallas, Einstein.


Here is a video of my favorite group doing what was their best song in the Early 90's. It was the song we were playing the night that we were throwing water balloons into the lowered pickups of all the "cool kids" outside of the Taco Bell. They, of course chased us, but when they are in a lowered truck and I am in a jacked up truck "terrain" is the name of the game. Not the smartest thing i ever did, but damn fun.


Here is the song that I danced to the night that I went to an episcopal camp and was "the guy" to dance with at their dance. Was I a good dancer? Hell no. I'm baptist, I can't dance to save my life. But as the "baptist guy" there, I was the poor mans substitute for the "bad boy" at a church camp full of Episcopal girls who had gone to the same camp with the same guys for years. A lot of those girls felt it was their destiny to rebel against their parents by kissing "the baptist guy" at camp, so who was i to stand in the way of progress and rebellion and the like?


Finally, this was the song, or at least the music, that made me wish that I played guitar. It's from the movie Crossroads. This scene is at the end where Ralph Macchio plays (actually Ry Cooder plays the guitar for his parts) against the Devil's guitarist (Steve Vai) for the soul of his friend who had traded it to the Devil way back when at the crossroads for a "mojo hand."


So now, you've had a small exposure to musically odd Rob. I'll cap this with a song that I want to dedicate to all the ladies.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, July 05, 2007

One more reason to hate those stupid eco-hipsters and their corn cob humping ethanol

The cost of beer has climbed 3 percent over the last year, slightly outpacing the rate of inflation, according to data from the Department of Labor.

And the cost of downing a brew at a restaurant or bar jumped 3.8 percent.

But the price of beer could see an even larger jump next year.

The price of barley, a key ingredient of most beers, has shot up 48 percent over the last 11 months. Since some breweries buy contracts for a year in advance, the increase in barley cost has not affected most beer prices.

"We're definitely concerned. We don't want to be in a position where to remain profitable we price our beer out of some consumers. We want to be able to keep our beer affordable," said Doug Odell, founder and brewmaster of Fort Collins-based Odell Brewing Co.

Odell said his company's production costs have gone up 10 percent to 15 percent over the last year. Since Odell buys its barley in October for the following year, the jump in its production costs is mostly from increases in the prices of energy and glass, Odell said.

The price of barley has escalated drastically, breweries and industry analysts said, in part because of a tighter supply caused by more farmers growing corn.

The advent of biofuels - such as E85, which is made of 85 percent corn ethanol - has helped push the price of corn futures up 49 percent since December 2005.

"More corn acres were planted this year than at any other time since 1944. Those acres had to come from somewhere," said Nancy Krull, director of marketing for the Minneapolis Grain Exchange, a commodity exchange.

Now, I can't speak for the calmer heads around here, but I'm personally going to have to consider issuing a "Beer drinkers fatwa" that terrorist actions against ethanol plants might be a good thing if it keeps beer cheap.

If the eco-wussies want to run around in chafing hemp clothes, I could care less. If they want to live in 0 carbon footprint homes made out of mud and recycled newspaper mache thats fine by me. But when they mandate ethanol production that is less chemically efficient, gives crappier gas milage and makes my beer cost more I'm pissed.

This may very well mean war.

(h/t Mom)

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Scenes from my office window (Thursday, July 5th)



Labels:

Monday, July 02, 2007

I just found a new map of Texas ...














Re-location, re-location, re-location.

Labels: ,

Thursday, June 28, 2007

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!

The comprehensive "piece of crap" (aka Immigration bill) has been wounded. Most likely mortally!

All I can say is that Cornyn and Hutchison, both R-Texas, voted the right way.

Some illuminating quotes on this one:
"Congress really needs to prove to the American people that it can come together on hard issues," Bush said.
They did, GW.

They came together and said to themselves "Holy shit, the unwashed masses are really pissed about this and no matter how much special interest money I might get, or what great pork I can trade for, I better kill it or find another day job."
"Everyone knows that our immigration laws are broken," Schumer said. "And a country loses some of its greatness when it can't fix a problem that everyone knows is broken. And that's what happened today."
Let's explore that logic, Chucky.

A government fails to enforce the laws that is passes. Should they:

a. Quit fucking around and enforce the laws they have
b. Quit fucking around and at least "try" to enforce the laws they have
c. Fuck around, yet eventually enforce the laws they have
d. Have a shit flinging monkey fest in which they solve nothing, call their own people racist, ignore the voters and generally fuck around, other than making a bunch of law breaking people legal and giving them free crap.

It seems that in Washington logic, D is the congressman's answer. Or at least it would have been, until thousands to millions of people gave a collective "WTF" to their officials and told them that we'll let you play your stupid political games all day long but America, for the most part, expects you to not give our country away.

I still expect that the next election will have a great deal of turn over just from this issue alone and well it should. So for all the congressional members consider this your notice, much like the one that the old media establishment received over "Rathergate" and the like:

The Internet has leveled the field. You once thought that the people were stupid and easy to fool. Individually, that very well may be. But collectively, we are smarter than you, we have more time than you, we have a more vested interest than you and we are watching you. If you try to screw us, we will notice and we will return the favor, in spades.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

That robot video ...

reminds me of my nephews' antics in Nova Scotia.


They were very, very far away from home.

Labels: , ,

Friday, June 15, 2007

Just a thought

One of the things that I think has truly frustrated me in the events surrounding the immigration debate is that the level of punditry has totally destroyed the ability to discuss the issues at hand. Before you can even ask a question or try to identify the problem or look up some data it's be sanded, primed and triple coated in someones opinion. Now that's OK for the blogs or the political talk shows but I beginning to have serious doubts about the ability of our legislators to make a decision because there doesn't seem to be any data that they get that hasn't been ideologically vetted.

Even if one were wanting to turn a critical eye towards the issue, the truth of the matter is that every place they pull data from is usually tainted by the fact that it's a government bureaucracy that is trying to justify it's existence. Seriously, do you think that INS is going to say that we need less agents here and more over there? They might do that internally, but from the outside they know better than to have the words "we need less" in anything that gets passed on to a entity that does their budget.

Add to this that special interests groups are more than happy to push data that helps their side while ignoring critical point that cast their narrative in a less than wholesome light. You can assume that every ACLU brief will see government abuse by over protection or the lack thereof. You know that the NRA is going to push to keep the 2nd amendment's as free of limitations as possible. You know that PETA isn't going to link celery to cancer, but will instead "find" that meat might be linked.

None of this is surprising.

That being said, I used to think that politicians were intentionally idealistic past the point of reason on purpose. To some degree, I'm sure that some of them are. However, I'm beginning to wonder if both sides of the aisle aren't as much ideologues as they are simply the result of never having a piece of information that doesn't confirm their preconceptions due to the people that supply them.

I have no doubt that if you told all of the Congressmen that "green" was "orange" all the time that eventually some of them would just call it "orange" in order to agree with the crowds and to get some votes.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, June 08, 2007

A summer School Update

As of this Monday I have been in the summer session of physics. To say that it has been difficult is an understatement.

I have no doubt that I'll get it but with an entire semester crammed into 1 month the question is will I get it in time. This is twice as difficult for me because the last time I did any trig was in ... let's see... 1990? Yeah, it's been a while.

As a result of the pace of the class, I had my first test today. I felt pretty good about every problem I did except one. How I actually did is a totally different story all together. I won't know that until Monday, but from experience I've learned to remain only guardedly optimistic, at best. As a rule of thumb, when doing a lot of math, dyslexic people learn to not count their chickens before they're hatched.

The good thing is that the Prof is really good. So while I do feel like I've had my butt strapped to a rocket and fired straight into "Physics land", at least I can calculate the various variables of said projectile depending on the variables given.
That's something, right?

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, June 05, 2007

Contrast and comparison

Today's Comparison is "1997 Rob" vs "2007 Rob"

Pets:
97 Rob: A EL Salvador Blue Iguana named "Vader"
07 Rob: A SPCA dog named "Trinity"

Largest Concern:
97 Rob: Scoring with my girlfriend
07 Rob: Scoring with my wife after the kids are in bed and the infant is asleep and the bills are paid and the trash is out, ect, ect...

Biggest problem:
97 Rob: School is tough, work doesn't pay enough, my car is beginning to act funny and I think I'm losing my hair
07 Rob: School is tough, work doesn't pay enough, my car is beginning to act funny and I know I'm losing my hair

What I do for fun:
97 Rob: Hanging out with my girlfriend or friends, sharking pool, playing hockey, cycling, rollerblading, swimming, camping, video gaming, reading, watching sports, seeing movies, playing cards and drinking.
07 Rob: Hanging with the wife and kids, video games, watching sports segmented by Tivo pauses, video games and trying to score with my wife after the kids are in bed and the infant is asleep and the bills are paid and the trash is out, ect, ect...

My advice to the "youth of America"
97 Rob: Be true to yourself and follow your dreams and you'll find happiness
07 Rob: Quit acting like retards

My politics:
97 Rob: Well, you shouldn't really tell people what to do so I err towards the side of individual freedom.
07 Rob: Less government, less taxes, less social programs, pro-life, pro-US, capitalistic, Conservative, theo-con.

Message to the President:
97 Rob: Get your head out of your ass.
07 Rob: Get your head out of your ass.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Caprichos

When I was in school, the first time around, I had a paper that I wrote in art history over Goya and a series of prints that he did called the Caprichos. Wikipedia covers them a little better here. The gist of what he was doing was taking a series of really skewering shots at Spanish society, from to to bottom.

Each person in the class had to write a paper over one of the images from the series. This was my image.
The lithograph is of human female faced owls flying around with human male faced owls as three women below them put a plucked male faced fowl on a spit. It didn't make sense prior to me researching it but in the efforts of writing the paper I discovered that whores in Spain, at that time, were commonly called "Buhos", or owls. This was due to the hours that owls, as well as whores, kept and the fact that they both hunted at night. This knowledge helps the print make more sense as you can see that the older women, presumably the madames of the whore houses, are the ones shown as preying on the male owls that have been snared.

So why tell you all of this? I have no idea other than the fact that my office is over near Northwest Highway and at least once a week you'll see something like this.

It constantly reminds me that the money girl like this makes never stops with them. There is always someone behind it, be it a pimp or a dealer, that gets that cash. What's worse is that this girl and whatever guys climb on her are the ones that are taking the risks and will eventually burn themselves down.

For my 2 cents, there is no such thing as a victimless crime.

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, May 26, 2007

"Let Are Kids Walk"

From WFAA.com:
Students who had been planning to walk across the stage at graduation ceremonies this weekend were instead walking a picket line Thursday morning.

The Trimble Tech High School seniors marched in front of Fort Worth Independent School District headquarters to protest Wednesday's decision by trustees to bar students who failed the TAKS test from commencement exercises.

About a dozen young people, carrying signs and chanting, began picketing at 8:30 a.m. Thursday. They represent the 613 Fort Worth seniors who did not pass the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills exam.
Okay, lets start with the worst part of the article. The photo used to lead the story includes a protester with a sign which reads "Let Are Kids Walk." This is just so sad that I have no words.

Next, we have the apparent overachiever on campus lamenting the fact that she will be unable to graduate with her 3.5 GPA:
Crystal Martinez complained that while she finished at the top of her class with a 3.5 grade point average, she is now blocked from graduation by failing the TAKS test.
How sad a day for education in America when the best a student at any school can do is pull a 3.5. And what does this say of the teachers when they GIVE her the grades that amount to a 3.5 and she is still too dumb to pass a test which the teachers essentially TEACH TO in the first plac.?

Parents of several teens that I know have long commented about the fact that their children are being taught the test and little else in school, and now the kids not only can't identify the Republic of Texas on a map, but they can't even pass a test that the teaches emphasize in the curriculum.

And don't tell me the test is too difficult. Obviously it isn't the test. Look at the sign in the article.

Labels:

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Ecards

Since Hood gave you the Seal Generator, I might as well pass along this. It's a nifty collection of ecards you can send.



Labels: , , ,

Monday, May 14, 2007

Ok ... you geniuses .... you ....

a) said lightbulb detaches from said retina.


b) said lightbulb is pretty hot.
c) user knows you can shove a spud into the socket and twist the sucker out.
d) is it green?
e) does it go boom?

Labels: ,