CNN has a story out about the newest findings on "Abstinence based" sex education programs. In the way that only CNN can, they titled the story "Study: Abstinence programs no guarantee" to which the skeptic in me is dying to reply "No shit, no one ever said they were." Still, my general avarice with CNN aside, for once I think we're on the same side.
I was told a story once that I find fitting to share now:
There was once a world renown anthropologist who went to study a reclusive tribe of people along the one of the major inland rivers of Australia. As he met the tribal leaders and earned their trust he was eventually allowed to live inside of their village. On his first day inside of the village, he was watching the interplay of social events surrounding the women and children down around the water's edge. The women were washing clothes and the children were playing in the shallow water of the river.
Suddenly, a huge croc lurched out of the calm water and pulled a young boy under. The people at the water's edge all turned to look, but the only reaction that they had was to shake their heads in sadness. They then continued to work and play as if nothing had happened.
Shocked, the anthropologist noticed that across the bank of the river two more crocs slid into the water and headed towards the people on the near bank. He stood up and began to scream and yell for them to get out of the water, as he hurried that direction. Most of the people ignored him, a few averted their eyes from him but none of them stopped what they were doing.
The water exploded again as two more people disappeared under the brown murky waters. The crocs, apparently full, did not come back that day but the anthropologist struggled with how to make sense of what he had just seen. Later that day the men of the town came back from hunting and the anthropologist ran to talk to the leader of the tribe. As he began to anxiously tell the leader his story. The leader put his hand up to silence him. He said, " Stop. We do not speak about the crocodiles. And you must not speak on it any more." The anthropologist asked why. "We do not speak of the crocodiles because it is a sacred, natural thing. What it does is personal." The anthropologist was unwilling to let it go as he told the leader that it's obvious that people and crocodiles can live in the same area but those animals were a danger, he should warn his people. Still the leader told him to discuss it no more. Now surely, this couldn't happen in real life, right? If you know my sarcasm, you know the answer is: wrong. It happens here, everyday.
Sex is like that croc in that it is beautiful and natural and can be part of our lives but it is dangerous as well. I'm of the mind that kids deserve to have a full ammo belt when they make decisions about sex. You can tell them about diseases and biology, but real sex education is a lot less textbook and a lot more nuts and bolts; pun fully intended.
Sure, science nerds like myself can understand things like "why pre-ejaculate seminal fluid is actually more likely to fertilize the egg" but the average kid need to have that "boring science" barrier broken. They need to be told, point blank, that "pulling out" isn't even vaguely reliable. The need to be told, point blank, that a good orgasm may be the best feeling they've ever had but the biological purpose of that is still producing a child. They need to know that there are emotional, psychological, physiological and spiritual aspects to these decisions that are better decided before you're hot and bothered in the back seat of the car. They need to be taught that "girls give sex to get love" and that "boys give love to get sex."
If we don't want to talk about it, I guess we can let them wander into that minefield on their own. I mean, hey, they have Paris Hilton and Anna Nicole to look to for information, right?
So, color me in on the "against abstinence only programs" side of the docket. I don't consider cultural taboo and "protecting the children" to be a higher cause than actually equipping them. Likewise, as much as I wish it weren't so, society's morality today is so relative that the inherent moral stance of abstinence is questioned. I mean, you can be a slut and still be a good person, right? You can still be a "player" and deserve respect, right? There was a time, young folks, when the answer "no." Now? Well now sex is billed like your own personal Six Flags, where you can ride whenever, however and with whomever you want, with no consequences. That is, until it's too late and mister HIV, STD or pregnancy come along and punch your ticket. That's a dishonesty that is worse that those who refuse to educate kids.
There is a balance in there, but it's not real popular. It's called "personal responsibility." It's where you take all the information you can find and use it to make judgements on your actions before you commit them. Hopefully, one day that will catch on, but for right now let's just make sure we educate people enough to give them the tools to make a decent judgement.Labels: abortion, censorship, christianity, politics, sex, spanking, thongs |